Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

An empirical survey and proposed Bankruptcy Code section concerning the propriety of bidding incentives in a bankruptcy sale of assets

Article Abstract:

An ex ante analysis should be employed instead of the current ex post approach to evaluate the propriety of bidding incentives in bankruptcy asset sales. The current approach is the result of bankruptcy courts' adopting law from the takeover context without fully appreciating the differences between normal takeovers and sales of assets in bankruptcy. Instead, these cases are most similar to Revlon duty-to-auction cases. This analysis suggests that bidding incentives should be limited to topping fees or break-up fees, and a proposed Bankruptcy Code section codifying such limits is provided.

Author: Lackey, Paul B.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1993
Economic aspects, Bankruptcy law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Ethical dilemmas and the multistate lawyer: a proposed amendment to the choice-of-law rules in the Model Rules of Professional Conduct

Article Abstract:

Personal jurisdiction analysis based on minimum contacts should be integrated into the choice-of-law rules governing legal ethics dilemmas faced by lawyers practicing in multiple jurisdictions. 1993 amendments to Rule 8.5 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct are inadequate because they do not make use of traditional conflicts of law principles and because the predominant effects test provides little guidance. Federalization of ethical rules is not a solution because it would encroach on states' rights and because most lawyers do not engage in multistate practices.

Author: Felleman, Susanna
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1995
United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Personal jurisdiction, Conflict of laws, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Keeping sex out of the attorney-client relationship: a proposed rule

Article Abstract:

An ethical rule should be adopted by the legal profession to ban the initiation of sexual relations between attorney and client during representation. Such relations are unethical because of the power imbalance which is inherent in the attorney-client relationship. Current approaches based on conflict of interest, misconduct and breach of fiduciary duty have been inadequate. Therefore, the issue should be dealt with directly by the adoption of a rule, as other professions have done.

Author: O'Connell, John M.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1992
Social aspects, Standards, Sexual ethics, Practice of law, Attorney and client

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Legal ethics
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Consumer protection in the European Union: an analysis on the directive on the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees
  • Abstracts: New DOL proposed regulations concerning procedures applicable to all ERISA plans. Department of Labor publishes guidance issued to regional and district office investigators concerning effect of potential Y2K computer problems on ERISA covered plans
  • Abstracts: IRS issues proposed regulations concerning plan administration with new technologies. IRS issues final regulations concerning the grandfathering of qualified long-term care contracts and consumer protection issues
  • Abstracts: Local pesticide regulation. Regulating the internal labor market: an information-forcing approach to decision bargaining over partial relocations
  • Abstracts: Financial planning regulation and the life insurance agent. The importance of properly funding universal life
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.