Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Animation is invading courtrooms; powerful tool

Article Abstract:

Computer animation is a potent tool in the trial lawyer's demonstrative evidence arsenal. The admissibility of this kind of expert evidence depends on the qualifications of the people preparing it. The effective use of computer animation requires much advance planning, ranging from where the equipment should be placed so that displays can be seen by everyone in the courtroom to what type of equipment will give the best results. Computer animation is particularly effective in patent cases for showing why an invention is different from 'prior art.'

Author: Dabney, James W.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Trial practice

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Patent win attributed to 3-D computer imagery: success in patent infringement lawsuit demonstrates the impact of three-dimensional animation

Article Abstract:

Mosinee Paper successfully prosecuted James River Corp using a computer rendering to show that Mosinee's invention of a paper dispenser was original and that James River's subsequent design copied Mosinee's. James River tried to have the case dismissed on the grounds that Mosinee's invention was made obvious by a similar, prior device made by a third party. Mosinee countered James River's deceptive two-dimensional drawings with an animated, narrated computer image of each of the devices, showing their true differences.

Author: Dabney, James W.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
United States, Testimony, Patent law, Three-dimensional graphics, Three dimensional graphics, Patent practice

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Moving graphics; computer animation enters criminal cases

Article Abstract:

Computer animation and videotape are increasingly popular demonstrative aids in criminal trials. There are potential problems. This technology is still relatively expensive and may favor prosecutors and rich defendants. Speculation may be introduced in an effort to create a continuous display. Psychological concerns include undue influence of jurors and possible subliminal messages. The technology is so new that there is no research that addresses these concerns precisely.

Author: Sherman, Rorie
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Video tapes in courtroom proceedings, Video evidence

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Methods, Usage, Innovations, Evidence, Demonstrative, Demonstrative evidence, Computer animation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A critical misdiagnosis: how courts underestimate the anticompetitive implications of hospital mergers. Hospitals, mergers, and two-stage competition
  • Abstracts: High tech is going mainstream; will lawyers not using computers be sued? Networks: low cost, world wide; firms find it cheaper than foreign offices
  • Abstracts: Injury to competitors is injury to competition: predatory pricing under state law. Efficiencies in merger cases: technological 'diffusion' as the cure for short-run monopoly pricing
  • Abstracts: In opinions to clients, intellectual property lawyers face risks. Standard of care in intellectual property law opinions
  • Abstracts: Impact of the Xerox case on the computation of the deemed-paid foreign tax credit from UK corporations
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.