Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Hospitals, mergers, and two-stage competition

Article Abstract:

The author analyzes government antitrust actions concerning hospital mergers and focuses on hospital competition and the identification of the customer from an antitrust standpoint. The author indicates that hospital competition occurs at two levels and regulatory agencies have identified contracting health plans as the customer.

Author: Vistnes, Gregory
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 2000
United States, Analysis, Competition (Economics), Consumers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A critical misdiagnosis: how courts underestimate the anticompetitive implications of hospital mergers

Article Abstract:

Hospital mergers are a growing trend which can do much to hurt consumers. Unfortunately, courts have generally been extremely reluctant to block mergers. This is because of a series of misunderstandings by courts of the effects on competition of hospital mergers.

Author: Conners, Jennifer R.
Publisher: University of California Press
Publication Name: California Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0008-1221
Year: 2003
Legal issues & crime, Acquisitions & mergers, Government regulation (cont), Government regulation, Legal/Government Regulation, Consumer Protection Laws, Consumer protection, Company acquisition/merger, Antitrust issue

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A new approach to the analysis of hospital mergers

Article Abstract:

The lack of success that federal antitrust enforcement agencies have had in bringing merger cases against hospitals since the 1982 Merger Guidelines were adopted suggests that a new approach is needed. Despite the fact that the guidelines establish that most hospital mergers are anticompetitive, the government has lost five of the seven suits it has brought. The government should rely less on market structure analysis and should be more willing to consider community benefits and efficiency justifications. Greater weight should also be given to proof that the institutions involved may be distressed or failing.

Author: Sims, Joe
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1996
Economic aspects, Acquisitions and mergers, Investigations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Laws, regulations and rules, Mergers, acquisitions and divestments, Hospitals, Antitrust law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The state of paperless courts: a report on the continuing evolution of e-filing. Protected from the elements: security for small-and medium sized law firms
  • Abstracts: Online legal services: threat or opportunity? Four attorneys debunk, debate and discuss the myths and realities of the legal Internet Age
  • Abstracts: Parallel district court and ITC patent infringement actions and PTO interferences. A critique of recent opinions in patent interferences
  • Abstracts: Is qui tam law unconstitutional? The Supreme Court shows interest in the issue - in about-face. Record USIA deal ends a 23-year saga; one lawyer, then more, then more produce $500M deal
  • Abstracts: Antitrust law; globalization and the E.U. Antitrust; electronic media. Antitrust law; what's the FTC up to?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.