Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Antitrust policy in aftermarkets

Article Abstract:

Economic analysis indicates that there are legitimate reasons for applying antitrust laws to durable goods aftermarkets because producers have the incentive to tie aftermarket goods and services, tying will harm consumers and contractual remedies will not suffice. Tying can occur in aftermarkets when sellers of durable goods require consumers to purchase nonproprietary goods or services along with proprietary supplies for the durable goods. Antitrust analysis can prove important to demonstrate that supercompetitive prices are being charged for the non-proprietary goods and that consumers are being harmed.

Author: Borenstein, Severin, MacKie-Mason, Jeffrey K., Netz, Janet S.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1995
Economic aspects, Industrial equipment

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A quality-signaling rationale for aftermarket tying

Article Abstract:

Tying of complementary nondurable goods to the sale of durable goods may yield beneficial results for consumers by signalling to them that the durable goods are high quality. Because of imperfect information, consumers may have little assurance that a durable good is of high quality. Tying agreements are often associated with competitively priced high-quality durables and supracompetitively priced complementary goods. This consumer welfare justification would seem to apply to the facts in Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services.

Author: Werden, Gregory J., Schwartz, Marius
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Demand elasticities in antitrust analysis

Article Abstract:

The economic principles of demand elasticity remained important for the antitrust practitioner to know. Demand elasticity has moved from theoretical practices to becoming important equations for understanding markets and their strengths and to predict the competitive effects of mergers. Another important use for demand elasticity has been in the ranking of substitutes.

Author: Werden, Gregory J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1998
Usage, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Demand (Economics), Elasticity (Economics)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Interpretation and construction, Laws, regulations and rules, Antitrust law, Tying agreements, Tying arrangements, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Tax considerations in selecting commodity and securities trading entities. Tax considerations in selecting commodity and securities trading entities and advisers
  • Abstracts: An economic overview of patents. An economic review and suggessted approach for licensing patent applications
  • Abstracts: Out of the blue. The politics of choosing judges; despite power plays and litmus tests, judicial selection process is not so bad
  • Abstracts: Risk assessment and policy-making. Joint health and safety institutes: a new UK approach? 5 Star at Merck Sharp & Dohme
  • Abstracts: Keeping it simple: making regulators write in plain language. Sunrises without sunsets: can sunset laws reduce regulation?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.