Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Arbitrating statutory rights in the union setting: breaking the collective interest problem without damaging labor relations

Article Abstract:

Unions and employers should establish a separate arbitration track to handle statutory claims made by individual employees within the labor arbitration process. Separating statutory claims from other collective bargaining issues would preserve labor's autonomy in arbitration and eliminate the collective interest problem with binding arbitration. The separation of claims would also meet procedural guidelines.

Author: Kim, Albert Y.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1998
Cases, Negotiation, mediation and arbitration, Labor unions, Employment discrimination, Labor arbitration

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Medical monitoring plaintiffs and subsequent claims for disease

Article Abstract:

The author discusses whether collateral estoppel should apply in a toxic tort case where injuries arise which were not apparent in a prior suit when damages were awarded to pay for the plaintiff's future medical monitoring and emotional distress. She concludes that principles of adequate compensation of injured parties and public policy support not applying collateral estoppel in such a case.

Author: McCall, Kara L.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1999
Analysis, Forecasts and trends, Remedies, Personal injuries, Toxic torts, Patient monitoring, Physiologic monitoring, Res judicata

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Arbitrating consumer claims under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act

Article Abstract:

The Federal Trade Commission holds that binding arbitration agreements in warranties are not valid because the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act does not provide for them. The FTC is here placing Magnuson-Moss in direct conflict with the Arbitration Act. It does not have the power to do this without a specific directive from Congress.

Author: Wiechens, Katie
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 2001
Warranty, Laws, regulations and rules, Powers and duties, United States. Federal Trade Commission, Commercial arbitration agreements

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Aspects of systemwide discontent: learning to live together, avoiding divorce. Securitization: an overlooked financing vehicle for franchisors
  • Abstracts: Habeas corpus, relitigation, and the legislative power. Rights essentialism and remedial equilibration. Marbury, original jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court's supervisory powers
  • Abstracts: A human rights critique of the WTO: some preliminary observations. "The times they are a'changin'": some preliminary thoughts on developing countries, NGOs and the reform of the WTO
  • Abstracts: A human rights critique of the WTO: some preliminary observations. part 2 The influence and lack of influence of principles in the negotiation for China's accession to the World Trade Organization
  • Abstracts: European Community law - legal status of international agreements within the Community legal order - General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade - Lome Conventions
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.