Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

European Community law - legal status of international agreements within the Community legal order - General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade - Lome Conventions

Article Abstract:

The EC Court of Justice determined that GATT 1947 could not be used to challenge national norms in national courts but that the Fourth Lome Convention may allow for such challenges. The case, Italian Ministry of Finance v. Chiquita Italia, involved a consumption tax on fresh bananas, including bananas imported from non-member states. The ruling concerned whether rights were created by GATT and Lome. The Court found that Lome may have a direct effect on national law, GATT infringements may cause a liability and GATT 1994 may have direct effects.

Author: Montana i Mora, Miguel
Publisher: American Society of International Law
Publication Name: American Journal of International Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0002-9300
Year: 1997
Cases, International obligations, European Union

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Reconciling extradition with human rights

Article Abstract:

Extradition treaties enforcing international criminal law should incorporate guidelines for addressing human rights law. Protocols for balancing human rights with international law enforcement will allow a country to deny an extradition request under agreed upon treaty conditions, preserving a treaty's sanctity. Treaties incorporating human rights will reflect the growing importance placed upon international human rights and upon law enforcement.

Author: Dugard, John, Van den Wyngaert, Christine
Publisher: American Society of International Law
Publication Name: American Journal of International Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0002-9300
Year: 1998
Social aspects, Political aspects, Human rights, International offenses

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Extradition - death penalty - U.S.-Canada extradition treaty - death penalty under international law

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the Canadian Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Burn, in which the court ruled that extradition without assurance that the death penalty will not be carried out violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Author: Schabas, William A.
Publisher: American Society of International Law
Publication Name: American Journal of International Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0002-9300
Year: 2001
United States, Canada, Capital punishment

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Interpretation and construction, Treaties, international, Laws, regulations and rules, Extradition
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The Independent Counsel statute: what went wrong? Rethinking the Electoral College debate: the Framers, federalism, and one person, one vote
  • Abstracts: Habeas corpus, relitigation, and the legislative power. Rights essentialism and remedial equilibration. Marbury, original jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court's supervisory powers
  • Abstracts: Development in the law: international criminal law. Almost private remedy: foreign party suits and the U.S. antitrust laws
  • Abstracts: Feminist legal analysis and sexual autonomy: using statutory rape laws as an illustration. Toward a new history of American accident law: classical tort law and the cooperative first-party insurance movement
  • Abstracts: Full and fair resolution of whistleblower issues: the Hanford Joint Council for resolving employee concerns, a pilot ADR approach
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.