Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Are term limits undemocratic?

Article Abstract:

The imposition of term limits on elected officials is prodemocratic because it addresses collective action and entry barrier problems that cannot be resolved through conventional voting. The Supreme Court mistaken asserted in U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton that term limits are antidemocratic because they interfere with voters' preferences. For both legislators and executives, term limits reduce the barriers imposed by incumbency. Without term limits, voters are likely to reelect an influential legislator despite the fact that there may be a new candidate that they might prefer.

Author: Elhauge, Einer
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1997
Analysis, Political aspects, Representative government and representation, Representative government, Term limits

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The triggering function of sale of control doctrine

Article Abstract:

The current doctrine governing sales of controlling blocks of stock effectively discriminates between beneficial and harmful transfers of control. Reform proposals from two different schools would either always or never allow noncontrolling shareholders to share the premium price commanded by sale of controlling shares. The result would be either overdeterrence of beneficial transfers or underdeterrence of harmful transfers. The current doctrine triggers the equal sharing approach when abuse seems likely, otherwise following the deregulatory approach.

Author: Elhauge, Einer
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1992
Stocks, Stock transfer

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The work product doctrine: functional considerations and the question of the insurer's claim file

Article Abstract:

The work product doctrine should be applied by courts to discovery requests for insurance claim files in first-party insurance cases with a rule which considers the realities of the insurance industry and the doctrine's intent. Discovery should be denied only for preparations in anticipation of litigation occurring after a claim has been denied. Encouragement of adequate trial preparation is the general intent behind the work product doctrine and this rule should protect insureds and ensure adequate litigation preparation.

Author: Young, Mary Beth Brookshire
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1997
Testimony, Insurance claims adjustment, Claims adjustment (Insurance), Work product privilege (Law), states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Mass torts: the Windsor decision and considerations for a coordinated defense. Discovery of litigation databases stored on the Internet: a basis for libel?
  • Abstracts: Tilting the table? The use of preliminary injunctions. Patenting in the shadow of competitors. Development of an HIV research database using Medicaid claims data
  • Abstracts: Fund managers, foreign investment restrictions and questions of control. Foreign investment power and control of foreign investment in newspapers
  • Abstracts: British re-nationalization and regulation: the government's liability to shareholders
  • Abstracts: Bomb trial ploy could self-destruct. Court to consider resale price ceilings, floors; the high court could overturn 'per se' law against maximum resale price maintenance
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.