Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Mass torts: the Windsor decision and considerations for a coordinated defense

Article Abstract:

The 1997 US Supreme Court decision in Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor illustrates the societal and legal problems of mass tort action. The Court ruled different plaintiffs did not receive equal protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. Mass torts will continue to grow for workplace injuries due to computer use and for tobacco-related diseases. A compromise is needed between rights to compensation and enormous costs inflicted on business.

Author: Hagan, Patrick J.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1998
Class actions (Civil procedure), Class action lawsuits, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Discovery of litigation databases stored on the Internet: a basis for libel?

Article Abstract:

The article discusses whether the information on Internet databases should be within the scope of discovery, the application of contractual restrictions to keep the information from being disclosed, and potential tort liability for Internet publication. The author also addresses the possible application of the attorney-client and work-product privileges to this issue, and argues for the protection of opinion work-product from discovery.

Author: Woodard, John R., III, Mouledoux, Rene, Rush, Barbara E.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1999
Usage, Internet, Libel and slander, Technology application, Legal research

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Ortiz v. Fibreboard: another blow to plaintiffs' classes as a means to resolve "mass tort" litigation

Article Abstract:

The author analyzes the Supreme Court's 1999 asbestos settlement case, Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp., and its possible influence on the future of mass tort litigation. The Court's close scrutiny of the rights of unrepresented plaintiffs is covered.

Author: Hagan, Patrick J.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1999
Analysis, Compromise and settlement, Cases, Settlements (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Mass tort suits
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Cross-cultural ethics and the child labor problem. Islamic ethics and the implications for business
  • Abstracts: The Victim's Charter: citizens as consumers of criminal justice services. Prison lives: critical issues in reading prisoner autobiography
  • Abstracts: FDA is aggressively enforcing GMP compliance; the agency has heightened the sanctions for deviations from good manufacturing practices
  • Abstracts: Campaign fund-raising abuses and money laundering in recent U.S. elections: criminal networks in action. Should campaign donors be identified?
  • Abstracts: Negotiated rulemaking and combined sewer overflows (CSOs): consensus saves ossification? Economic infeasibility and EPA's 1994 combined sewer overflow policy: a successful solution in Massachusetts still leaves a turbid understanding between state and federal officials
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.