Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Back to 'Miranda;' as one lawyer prepares to defend the rule, four who helped establish the landmark remember its adoption

Article Abstract:

The four attorneys who helped establish the landmark Miranda rule with their initial win in Miranda v. Arizona and later Supreme Court appearances of the case give some of their memories. The lawyers are F Conger Fawcett, William A Norris, John P Frank, and Victor M Earle. The memories span Supreme Courts through the Warren years.

Author: Coyle, Marcia
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2000
History, Miranda rule

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


States' immunity redux; patent, overtime cases bring issue back to high court

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court will revisit the federalism issue in 1999, and the three cases, from Maine and Florida, involve the claims of workers entitled to overtime pay and of patent holders. They cap a wave of federalism beginning in 1992 with New York v. U.S., which held that the federal Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985, involved an unconstitutional requirement that states administer a federal program. Since that ruling, the judges have evinced their concern with protecting states' rights by issuing other federalism rulings.

Author: Coyle, Marcia
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
Laws, regulations and rules, Federalism, State rights

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Whose court is it, anyway? O'Connor and Kennedy are swing votes; is that enough?

Article Abstract:

Justices Anthony M. Kennedy and Sandra Day O'Connor are swing votes on the US Supreme Court, but they share more philosophical consonance than dissonance and it is hard to say who is the more influential in determining the outcome of divisive cases. They are controlling votes but share a case-specific approach and have not done a great deal in developing a philosophical vision for the court. The court is more interested in balancing approaches than was true 15 years ago, and the two justices have contributed to that.

Author: Coyle, Marcia
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
Officials and employees, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, United States. Supreme Court, O'Connor, Sandra Day, Kennedy, Anthony M.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The third and fourth sessions of the UN Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court
  • Abstracts: Cultivating connectedness; lawyers should be able to tap into their firm culture when they're away. Life in question; how five lawyers worked out answers of their own
  • Abstracts: In the zone; by harnessing powers of concentration, any lawyer can gain the advantage to fare better in today's competitive legal marketplace
  • Abstracts: Patentability of computer related inventions in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Written description guidelines and utility guidelines
  • Abstracts: Out of the soup; 'anything can happen to anybody,' says a health care lawyer charged in a case that arose from his work
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.