Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Campaign finance just gets messier

Article Abstract:

The efforts to reform campaign financing by imposing very low contribution limits seem headed down a slippery slope and could result in a Supreme Court decision eliminating the $1,000 individual contribution limit that is currently the law for federal elections. We could then have a system of no contribution limits as a federal law enacting new, higher limits is unlikely given the congressional opposition to campaign finance reform. Case law striking down lower contribution limits is alluded to.

Author: Hasen, Richard L.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Prohibitions on campaign contributions from foreign sources: questioning their justification in a global interdependent economy

Article Abstract:

Foreign corporations' contributions to US political candidates, while banned by US law, should be considered acceptable in the emerging world economy. Legitimate foreign source contributions should be allowed and only bribes should be prohibited by law. Although a loophole allows foreign corporations to be funneled through their US subsidiaries, a better approach would be to openly acknowledge the changing world economy and the legitimate stake that foreign companies have in US elections.

Author: Powell, Jeffrey K.
Publisher: University of Pennsylvania
Publication Name: University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1086-7872
Year: 1996
International aspects, Donations, Foreign corporations, international

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Money and politics

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court in 1976's Buckley v. Valeo incorrectly stuck down post-Watergate political reform legislation which limited political expenditures. The case places a barrier against the greatest means to diminish the negative impact of money on political processes which is mandatory public election campaign financing. The 1st Amendment principle of preservation of public debate should have controlled and would have led to a different outcome.

Author: Fiss, Owen M.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1997
Cases, Political aspects, Expenditures, Public, Public expenditures

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Finance, Political campaigns, Campaign funds
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Group Term Life Insurance - Recent Developments. Congressional Report. Congressional Report: Hearings, Recent House Bills and Recent Senate Bills
  • Abstracts: Fund managers, foreign investment restrictions and questions of control. Foreign investment power and control of foreign investment in newspapers
  • Abstracts: In tribute: Charles Hamilton Houston. Bella Abzug: a leader of vision and voice. Dedication to Robert L. Teristi
  • Abstracts: Proving causation in toxic tort cases: T-cell studies as epidemiological and particularistic evidence. Inverse condemnation and the highway cases: compensation for abutting landowners
  • Abstracts: Compliance costs of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The unpopular disabled: drug addicts and alcoholics lose benefits
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.