Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Circuit prohibits import of gray market goods; the 9th Circuit rules first sale doctrine can't limit import ban

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled in L'Anza Research, International, Inc. v. Quality King Distributors, Inc. that importing copyrighted products without authorization constituted infringement, a blow to the gray market. The court ruled that the statute's permission to the owner to "sell or otherwise dispose of" legally made copies did not include the permission to import such copies. Using copyright law to exclude gray market goods provides more certainty than using trademark law and also gives the holder with a better chance of success. The L'Anza case will accelerate the gray market's consideration as a copyright issue.

Author: Gerber, David A., Bender, David
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
International trade regulation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Gray market becomes less of an IP gray area; after 'L'anza,' distributors are free to reimport U.S.-made goods meant to be sold abroad

Article Abstract:

The Copyright Act can be a powerful weapon against parallel importation since the products' collateral material is often protected by copyright even when the products themselves are not. and this law has been used in gray market analysis for the last decade. The United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in L'anza Research International, Inc. v. Quality King Distributors, Inc. found any unauthorized importation of copyrighted materials acquired abroad to be an infringement, and the Supreme Court acknowledged that its reversal would be significant for gray-market importation in many areas.

Author: Gerber, David A., Bender, David
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
International trade

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Courts help clear up legal haze regarding gray market goods

Article Abstract:

Two 1992 federal cases have given US copyright and trademark owners greater protection against gray marketers. Lever Bros Co v US uses the trademark laws to help bar gray market imports and BMG Music v Perez uses the Copyright Act for that purpose. Lever Bros ruled that Section 42 of the Lanham Act barred foreign goods with a US trademark but physically different from the US mark goods. BMG Music held that Section 109(a) of the Copyright Act of 1976, the first-sale doctrine, was not a defense to Section 602(a) forbidding US importation of copies obtained abroad.

Author: Gerber, David A., Bender, David
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Copyright, Copyrights, Trademarks

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Gray market
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: 'Brookfield' sets standards on domain name rights; 9th Circuit made key rulings on intent to use doctrine and use of another's mark in metatags
  • Abstracts: Workplace bias to the fore: Court to rule on factoring race into employment decisions. Back to work; job bias is at issue in three cases on the Court's expanded docket
  • Abstracts: Community profile, West Dallas, Texas; unto the third generation. Tension underlies rapport with grassroots groups
  • Abstracts: Judiciary curtails programs to pay for CJA. The '98 picture for a federally funded legal world. Legal bills stillborn in Congress; legislators leave town
  • Abstracts: Consolidated cases raise fairness issues. Market-share acceptance is still limited. How Cipollone affects other industries
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.