Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Citadel worth storming

Article Abstract:

Faulkner v. Jones, being heard before the US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, is concerned about whether parallel women's programs justify the Citadel military academy's exclusion of women. Neither South Carolina nor the Virginia Military Institute in Virginia have adequately explained the need to keep women out as a state interest. The parallel programs are not comparable, readily failing the test the US Supreme Court used in Sweatt v. Painter regarding a parallel law school for blacks. The schools' only defense is gender stereotypes.

Author: Rhode, Deborah
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Citadel foe feels ripple effects; attorney who beat S.C. institution finds career in shambles

Article Abstract:

The 1996 ruling issued by the US Supreme Court against The Citadel marked the end for state-supported single-sex programs such as that offered by the school. The trial judge in Mar 1999 affirmed the appellate court's ruling, awarding millions of dollars in legal fees to lawyers who had represented Shannon Faulkner. The judge praised Black for his role in the litigation, noting that Black endured ostracism and threats of injury for his role. Even Black's detractors admit that he suffered financially by taking on the Citadel.

Author: Ricks, Wade Stevens
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
United States, Legal services, Attorneys, Offices of Lawyers, Finance, Lawyers, Legal specialization, Black, Robert R.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Separate but equal revisited; the court weighs whether state-supported military schools may bar women

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court is considering the validity of separate but equal public education with regard to the sexes in US v VA, in which oral arguments were heard Jan 17. VA argues the VA Military Academy offers educational diversity, and that admitting women would destroy that diversity. The 4th Circuit agreed that a women's program called the VA Women's Institute of Leadership was a valid alternative, but that program makes many assumptions about gender differences and is not comparable.

Author: Urbonya, Kathryn R.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Sex discrimination, Military education, Virginia Military Institute, The Citadel
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Passing marks for sex ed; courts reject constitutional challenges to school programs. Witnesses to tragedy; courts open door to more suits for negligent infliction of emotional distress
  • Abstracts: Defending American democracy: lawyers play a key role in ensuring that the Constitution remains vibrant. Let's not take it anymore: speaking out against spurious attacks on the legal system is vital
  • Abstracts: Getting a fix on fees: computers chip away at hourly billing in real estate matters. Real reform
  • Abstracts: Fear of filing: securities fraud plaintiffs steering clear of federal restrictions by suing in state court, study says
  • Abstracts: Ten years later, officer recants; accused killer, once on death row, freed in 3d trial. Restaurant tries to break police silence; a fast-food chain can't get details of murders. Police say it would compromise probe
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.