Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Common law constitutional interpretation

Article Abstract:

Describing current constitutional interpretation as common law interpretation acknowledges that constitutional interpretation is not the equivalent of statutory interpretation. Statutory interpretation occurs within a command model that assumes the drafter dictates specific conduct. Current constitutional doctrine does not obey all the dictates of the Framers of the Constitution, in part, because modern society shares little in common with 18th century US society. The common law approach is also more intellectually honest than originalist or textualist approaches.

Author: Strauss, David A.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1996
Constitutional law, Constitutional interpretation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Conditioning forum non conveniens

Article Abstract:

The author proposes a model for the application of the forum non conveniens doctrine which would have as a guiding principle the protection of the plaintiff's position in relation to the reasonableness of forum choice. A history of relevant U.S. and English law precedes the model proposal.

Author: Bies, John
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 2000
United Kingdom, Models, Forum non conveniens, Civil procedure

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Internet service of process: a constitutionally adequate alternative?

Article Abstract:

Substantive and procedural constitutional issues concerning use of the Internet for service of process are discussed. The author concludes that in most cases, standards embodied within the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure would not be met with Internet service.

Author: Cantor, Rachel L.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1999
States, Analysis, Usage, Innovations, Internet, Due process of law, Process, Process (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Common law, Laws, regulations and rules, Personal jurisdiction
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Proposed conduit financing regulations. New section 367 temporary regulations. Transfer pricing: the new Section 482 temporary and proposed regulations
  • Abstracts: Service in international arbitration in light of articles 2 and 23 of the UNCITRAL rules and international practice
  • Abstracts: Values for probation, society and beyond. Risk management and rehabilitation in the probation service: collision and collusion
  • Abstracts: Critical issue: institutional reform and the IGC. Consumers and the euro. Business choices for EMU
  • Abstracts: Executive order allows PTO action arbitration: ADR can resolve civil claims by private parties against the PTO
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.