Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Confidentiality comes at a cost

Article Abstract:

The Virginia Supreme Court held, in Snyder-Falkinham v. Stockburger, that the confidentiality of mediation documents would only be protected if the parties initially agreed or the confidentiality was supported in trial court. The problem raised in the case was the enforceability of an agreement to which both parties allegedly agreed when one party later said she had not agreed. The trial court permitted mediation documents to be admitted as evidence to indicate the need to enforce the agreement and the Supreme Court held that the confidentiality should have been raised at that point.

Author: Rudlin, D. Alan, Faglioni, Kelly L.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Virginia, Compromise and settlement, Cases, Settlements (Law), Confidential communications, Mediation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Mass torts: now ripe for mediation; although they typically involve complicated technical issues, such cases still can be resolved more effectively outside of court

Article Abstract:

Mediation can be an effective way of resolving mass tort suits. Resolving these claims through the jury system is complicated by issues including vague liability and complex, large amounts of expert evidence. The complex issues can be almost impossible for juries to understand. Such cases tend to be very expensive and mediation is cheaper, allows the parties to communicate and to have some control over the results. Mass tort suits seem a cost of doing business in the US and mediation is a way of resolving such disputes.

Author: Rudlin, D. Alan
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Management, Mass tort suits

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Attorney-mediators face important ethical issues

Article Abstract:

Attorneys who also function as mediators have important ethical questions to consider. Lawyers' confidentiality may conflict with a mediator's duty to report legal misconduct. A conflict of interest may arise if the mediator would later represent a subject as a lawyer. Model rules and case law are discussed.

Author: Rudlin, D. Alan, Saunders, Greer D., Hulbert, Barbara L.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Legal services, Attorneys, Offices of Lawyers, Analysis, Lawyers, Ethical aspects, Legal ethics, Arbitrators

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Dispute resolution (Law)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: More states adopting divorce mediation: with nonlawyer mediators, some spouses will get bad deals, critics claim
  • Abstracts: HMO legislation is aimed at protecting patients; consumers and providers call for regulation; the managed care industry would disagree
  • Abstracts: Having made changes to the proposed regulations, the IRS issued final rules affecting the generation-skipping transfer tax
  • Abstracts: Winning the information revolution. Get it in writing: lawyers often fail to document due diligence in securities offerings
  • Abstracts: U.S. law firms in U.K. face a risk of new taxes; revolutionary change in U.K. law may increase compliance costs
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.