Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

More states adopting divorce mediation: with nonlawyer mediators, some spouses will get bad deals, critics claim

Article Abstract:

Attorneys and judges continue to debate the pros and cons of divorce mediation and courtroom adjudication of domestic relations matters. As this debate goes on, divorce mediation programs are becoming more prevalent. Proponents say mediation is less expensive and fosters cooperation between the parties, while critics say dispute resolution can lead to a bad deal for some. Rhode Island is the latest state to adopt divorce mediation. Other states with similar programs include California, Connecticut, Colorado, Florida and Hawaii.

Author: Trigoboff, Dan
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
Evaluation, Divorce mediation, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Courts saving time and trees; electronic case filings gain ground, but nonlawyer use is a stumbling block

Article Abstract:

Increase in pro se representation is a side effect of the growth in electronic case filings. Electronic case filing dates from 1991, when a Delaware state court first used to track the growing volume of asbestos-related litigation. Pro se litigants make up a large and growing share of trial court loads, and these courts must figure out a way to make electronic case filing accessible to them without giving them a license to engage in abusive litigation.

Author: Hansen, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1999
United States, Analysis, Technology application, Court records, Legal documents, Pro se representation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Annuities as fees get boost by tax ruling: judge says some structured settlements not taxable until payments received

Article Abstract:

The US Tax Court held in Childs v. Commissioner that taxes for attorneys paid with annuities from structured settlements can be deferred until receipt of the money. This decision rejected the IRS argument that under IRC 83, the attorneys could be taxed on the fair market value of the right to receive annuity payments as soon as the structured settlement was arranged. The court felt that the settlement agreements were not property as defined in IRC 83.

Author: Trigoboff, Dan
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
Usage, Taxation, Attorneys, Lawyers' fees, Structured settlements, Annuities

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Attorneys working with translators must watch over defendant rights. False logic misdirects the U.S. war on drugs
  • Abstracts: Seeing the facts, tapping the power of seeing as well as hearing. Understanding character evidence; four ideas that tie it all together
  • Abstracts: Control, responsibility, and abdication: a dilemma of securities regulation. An analysis and recommendation for prestigious underwriter participation in IPOs
  • Abstracts: Graduating with tech honors. Connecticut pushes digital deeds. Inside education
  • Abstracts: Child advocates take on GOP: they say block grants will limit foster care lawsuits. 'False' memory, big award; juries are penalizing therapists who evoke 'repressed' memories of abuse
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.