Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Conflict charges dog Ron Brown

Article Abstract:

Bill Clinton's Commerce Secretary-Designate and former Democratic National Committee chairman Ron Brown is under fire for alleged conflict of interest. Brown is a partner at Patton, Boggs and Blow in Washington, D.C. Critics are concerned about his lobbying on behalf of Japanese companies and on behalf of Haiti's former chief-of-state Duvalier. The issue which attracted the most publicity was New York City's award of a large contract to a waste management company in which Brown has stock shortly before New York was chosen as the 1992 site for the Democratic convention.

Author: MacLachlan, Claudia
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Political activity, Public opinion, Conflict of interests (Attorneys), Conflicts of interest (Lawyers), Brown, Ronald H.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Microsoft stalled by Tunney Act; but experts say the law ties Judge Sporkin's hands

Article Abstract:

Judge Stanley Sporkin is examining the government's settlement of antitrust charges against Microsoft Corp under the Tunney Act, which requires judicial review of antitrust settlements. The settlement disappointed much of Microsoft's competition, which was trying to rein in the company's sales practices. Sporkin may not be able to do much. The goal of the Tunney Act was never very clear, and most settlements reviewed under the act are not modified. Moreover, Sporkin wants to modify a consent decree, and the law makes no such provision.

Author: MacLachlan, Claudia
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Microsoft Corp., Unfair competition (Commerce), Unfair competition, MSFT

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Cable operators dismayed by 'must carry' ruling

Article Abstract:

A three-judge panel of federal district judges on Dec. 12, 1995, upheld rules issued by Congress requiring cable operators to carry television broadcasters' signals. The panel had early sided with the broadcasters, and the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision remanded an appeal back to the panel. Cable operators drew encouragement from the weakness of the panel decision, in which one judge noted he would have preferred the matter to go to trial. The Supreme Court may be unwilling to hear the case again.

Author: MacLachlan, Claudia
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
United States, Cable television, Must carry rules (Broadcasting)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Late challenge to Microsoft; a Silicon Valley lawyer says the software giant is still trying to stifle competition
  • Abstracts: DNA report raises concerns; study backs genetic evidence, but questions reliability of labs, statistics
  • Abstracts: DNA report raises concerns; study backs genetic evidence, but questions reliability of labs, statistics. part 2
  • Abstracts: Jurors' rights endorsed; report says they should be allowed to take notes, submit questions. Jury system alive and well; symposium endorses active role, better conditions for civil jurors
  • Abstracts: D.C. considers tax on professionals; beleaguered governments increasingly eye lawyers as revenue source
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.