Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Late challenge to Microsoft; a Silicon Valley lawyer says the software giant is still trying to stifle competition

Article Abstract:

Gary L. Reback, a lawyer from Palo Alto, CA's Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich and Rosati, has filed court papers complaining that Microsoft Corp is guilty of unfair competition, the settlement of the company's antitrust action with the Department of Justice notwithstanding. Reback based his argument on economists Garth Saloner and W. Brian Arthur's theory that since Microsoft dominates the computer operating systems marketplace, it inevitably dominates software applications markets as well. Legal observers doubt that Reback's claim will go far, citing the heavy presumption in favor a a settlement by the government.

Author: Slind-Flor, Victoria
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Management, Microsoft Corp., Antitrust law, Negotiation, mediation and arbitration, Unfair competition (Commerce), Unfair competition, MSFT

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


High court gambling case may give states big payoff; the Supreme Court ruled out Indian tribes' suits against states. Did it also immunize states from all IP claims?

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court ruled in Seminole Tribe v. Florida that Florida could regulate Native American gambling because the 11th Amendment kept states from having to waive their sovereign immunity in private actions to enforce federal rights. A dissent by Justice John Paul Stevens voiced concern about the consequences of the lack of a federal forum for actions against states.Many intellectual property lawyers (IP) agree with Stevens and are concerned about states using this defense in IP cases.

Author: Slind-Flor, Victoria
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
United States, Economic aspects, Cases, Gambling, Exclusive and concurrent legislative powers, Preemption (Legislative power), Native American business enterprises, Federal-state controversies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Jury commissions hope for more prominence

Article Abstract:

Approximately 17 jurisdictions have established commissions to discuss race and ethnic discrimination in the administration of justice, and they hope their efforts will receive more public response after the uproar over the acquittal of the policemen charged with using excessive force on Rodney King. Some commissions have already received a great many complaints from the public about widespread racism. Executing and financing commission recommendations can be a problem.

Author: Slind-Flor, Victoria
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Discrimination in justice administration, Justice discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Investigations
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Abortion pill triggers change in legal tactics; a leading anti-abortionist concedes that trying to battle such operations is futile
  • Abstracts: Anxious era for tax bar; the top tax lawyers are bracing themselves for President Clinton's still undefined changes
  • Abstracts: Clinton, Dole rate low on civil liberties; the president is seen as slightly more vigilant, but they both get rapped for playing to the crowd
  • Abstracts: Baseball's lawyer; Robert DuPuy goes to bat for the owners in antitrust, labor and other battles. He becomes unwilling focus
  • Abstracts: Justices seem to give INS the benefit of the doubt. Lawyers on juries may be bad idea. Indigent immigrants face welfare cuts, deportation; recent welfare and immigration reforms have heightened the need of noncitizens for legal representation and assistance
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.