Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Conflict of laws; real-world rules for interstate regulation of practice

Article Abstract:

Pro hac vice admission enables multistate practitioners to practice safely anywhere and gets around the possibility of enforcement of archaic unauthorized law practice statutes against out-of-state attorneys. The danger in enforcement of these laws is that the client can avoid paying legal fees. Another pitfall in multistate practice is the vast differences in ethics rules between jurisdictions. State ethics rules used to be almost identical, but this is no longer the case.

Author: Gillers, Stephen
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Analysis, Admission to the bar, Conflict of laws

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Under color of law; Second Circuit expands Section 1983 liability for government lawyers

Article Abstract:

Governments who have failed to adequately train a government employee can be guilty of a constitutional tort, even though the employee will probably have at least qualified immunity. Actions on the part of government attorneys that may warrant section 1983 claims against the government include conducting an investigation so as to violate due process and privacy rights and concealment of evidence pertaining to a civil claim.

Author: Gillers, Stephen
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Government liability, Constitutional torts, Government attorneys

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Fighting words; what was once comical is now costly

Article Abstract:

The 1970s and 1980s saw investigations of bias in the legal profession and generated an intolerance of biased behavior. A lawyer's use of biased behavior in an attempt to create a bond with the jury is an indirect instance of the bias problem. Lawyers try to connect with jurors in different and often ambiguous ways, and trying to pinpoint these as racist or sexist and decide on disciplinary measures can be difficult.

Author: Gillers, Stephen
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Social aspects, Standards, Legal etiquette, Racism, Sexism in language, Sexist language

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Useful suggestions for building an estate planning practice. Guidelines for reviewing an drevising an estate plan
  • Abstracts: Plan administrator held not liable for delay in distribution of s. 401(k) account. DOL criminal investigations of employee benefit plans: processes, penalties and trends
  • Abstracts: European Convention on Human Rights - refugees - international zones at airports - deprivation of liberty. National postal monopolies - international credit card billing - remailing restraints under Universal Postal Convention and European competition law: Deutsche Post AG v. Gesellschaft fur Zahlungssysteme mbH (GZS) and Citicorp Kartenservice GmbH
  • Abstracts: Fla. jurors hear tales of sex, religion, death. Legal techs face regulation; rules mulled nationwide. States enact 'stalking' laws; California takes lead
  • Abstracts: New product liability bills; congressional effort to supplant state laws resumes. Hard time; mandatory minimum sentencing comes under congressional scrutiny
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.