Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Constitutional innocence

Article Abstract:

Commentators long debated the constitutionality of strict liability crimes. Some argue that strict liability offenses, which do not require proof of a culpable mental state, are unconstitutional and unjust. A review of Supreme Court cases suggests the principle of constitutional innocence which upholds strict liability crimes while limiting their application. Under this principle, strict liability would be constitutional only if the intentional conduct to which the particular statute applied could be criminalized by the legislature.

Author: Michaels, Alan C.
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1999
Laws, regulations and rules, Criminal law, Strict liability

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Constitutional law - abortion - Sixth Circuit strikes down Ohio ban of post-viability and dilation and extraction abortions

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit held Ohio's prohibition of dilation and extraction abortions and of all abortions after fetal viability to be unconstitutional. However, the Supreme Court declared that the cardinal principle of statutory interpretation required federal courts to presume state laws to be constitutional by finding any fairly possible interpretation consistent with constitutionality. The 6th Circuit's ruling inverted this principle by resolving all statutory ambiguities in favor of unconstitutionality.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1999
Evaluation, Cases, Constitutional interpretation, Judicial process, Abortion

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Constitutional law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: National antitrust laws in a continental economy: a comparison of Canadian and American antitrust laws. Efficiency issues in competition analysis in Australia, the European Union, and the United States
  • Abstracts: National antitrust laws in a continental economy: a comparison of Canadian and American antitrust laws. part 2
  • Abstracts: The winged gudgeon - an early patent controversy. An economic incentives analysis of the jury's role in patent litigation
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.