Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Constitutional law - Fifth Amendment - Ninth Circuit rejects Public Use Clause challenge to Honolulu's lease-to-fee ordinance

Article Abstract:

The US 9th Circuit Court of Appeal's holding in Richardson v. City & County of Honolulu exemplifies the shortcomings of the US Supreme Court's takings jurisprudence. Courts have contorted the Public Use Clause so that the state's interests outweigh private interests. A fair takings policy which respects private property rights would provide a true market value for the targeted property based upon economic factors and the intent to promote economic efficiency.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1998
Judicial review of administrative acts, Ordinances, Municipal, Municipal ordinances

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Punishing dangerousness: cloaking preventive detention as criminal justice

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the criminal justice system's shift away from punishing crimes and toward preventing future violations through laws addressing dangerous habitual offenders. Topics include the need for increased prevention, the conflict between desert and dangerousness, and problems arising from the need to cloak preventive measures as doctrines of criminal punishment.

Author: Robinson, Paul H.
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2001
Analysis, Laws, regulations and rules, Criminal justice, Administration of, Administration of criminal justice, Law reform, Legal reform, Preventive detention

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Constitutional law - regulatory takings - Federal Circuit's holding introduces subjective factors into Takings Clause denominator analysis

Article Abstract:

A Federal Circuit decision allowing property owners to adjust their property holdings to meet the categorical regulatory takings rule established by the Supreme Court in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council is discussed. The circuit court's decision is criticized for introducing subjective factors into Takings Clause denominator analysis.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2001

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Regulatory taking (Law)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Constitutional law - equal protection - D.C. Circuit upholds military discharge based on a statement of homosexual orientation
  • Abstracts: Criminal law - sentencing guidelines - Second Circuit rejects Fifth Amendment challenge to disclosure criteria under the federal Sentencing Guidelines
  • Abstracts: Constitutional migration and the bounds of comparative analysis. Charitable choice and the critics
  • Abstracts: Principles, institutions, and the First Amendment. Fourth Amendment - exclusionary rule - Seventh Circuit holds that the suppression of evidence is a disproportionately severe sanction for a timing violation of the knock and announce requirement
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.