Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Court will exclude defective damages evidence

Article Abstract:

Attorneys must prepare expert evidence with care to ensure admissibility after the 1993 Supreme Court ruling in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmacuticals. The expert evidence is usually a critical part of the damages case in patent suits, because damages issues are usally complex and can best be shown through such evidence. Common arguments to try and exclude such evidence are not following the standards for complete evidentiary disclosure of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) or not showing one of the trial's issues of fact.

Author: Toikka, Richard S., Reeder, Marjorie J.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Product liability, Products liability

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Science and courts still struggle to cooperate

Article Abstract:

The Daubert case did more than establish a new standard for the admission of expert testimony. It advocated the use of summary judgment and other such judicial management tools to exclude speculative evidence, and keeping to this model could enhance public confidence in the courts. Scientific analysis should determine causality, not observation. General Electric v. Joiner, a case in which the Supreme Court has granted certiorari, raises this issue.

Author: Miller, Paul S., Rein, Bert W.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Expert witness; libel experts

Article Abstract:

The proliferation of expert witnesses in public-figure libel cases despite universal judicial disapproval of this practice in the past decade is discussed. The Libel Defense Resource Center has accumulated background on more than 100 people who have testified in such cases or are prepared to do so. Various cases are discussed.

Author: Leatherbury, Tom
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2000
United States, Libel and slander

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Evaluation, Testimony, Evidence, Expert, Expert evidence, Evidence, Scientific, Scientific evidence (Law)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Courting trouble: emergence of common-law courts raises concerns among critics
  • Abstracts: Tax Court upholds accelerated deduction for vacation and severance benefits funded by irrevocable letter of credit
  • Abstracts: A fine line between suborning and encouraging. States, feds and doctors tangle in drug war. Secret as a confession?
  • Abstracts: A developer's communitarian ideals bite back. NYSE land grab try: greed is still good
  • Abstracts: Dedication to Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. A tribute to Justice Stevens. Tribute to Norman Dorsen
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.