Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Deceit: the loss and the profits, the recovery of expected profits in an action for fraudulent misrepresentation

Article Abstract:

In certain circumstances a fraudulent representation may engender reasonable expectations of profit which should be compensated; however, case law is not clear nor has its lessons been consistently applied. In East v Maurer the principle was used that the plaintiffs were due compensation for the profit they might have made but for the misrepresentations that led them to buy the business they actually purchased. Apart from difficulties in applying such a rule, other cases suggest yet different criteria. Assimilating the measure for damages and breach of contract as practiced in American courts is preferable.

Author: Cumberbatch, Jeff
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The liability of banks to make restitution for wrongful payments

Article Abstract:

Constituency should be developed between common law and equitable agency defenses when claims are made against banks for fraudulent payment restitution. Ministerial receipt is the primary defense in cases where the bank acts as the customer's agent. However, beneficial receipt may also be applicable in cases involving breaches of fiduciary duties.

Author: Bryan, Michael
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1998
Banking industry, Tort liability, Tort liability of banks

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Claims to compound interest in restitution: awakening the sleeping giant

Article Abstract:

The author argues that Australian law should recognize a general right to claims to compound interest in restitution actions through equity's auxiliary jurisdiction. Claims to compound interest would be pleaded in every cause of action brought in unjust enrichment and interest would be recoverable at a commercial rate.

Author: Edelman, James
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1999
Australia, Interest, Interest (Finance)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Remedies, Fraud, Australia, Laws, regulations and rules, Restitution
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Are the Commissioner of Taxation's recovery powers fettered by state moratorium and limitation of actions legislation?
  • Abstracts: Pitfalls and prospects in partnership: probation programmes for substance misusing offenders. Offender literacy and the probation service
  • Abstracts: An overview of the antitrust analysis of suppression of technology. Foreword
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.