Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

"Disclose, disclose, disclose ... and then disclose some more!" (life insurance sales)

Article Abstract:

Life insurance policy illustrations for new insurance products have misled many policyholders because they did not understand the underlying principles of the illustrations. Insurance agents must expand their knowledge of the products to prevent these misperceptions by disclosing the nature of the product and how the policy illustrations are generated. The sophistication of recent insurance products and the software illustration programs require that agents teach clients about the product before clients can make accurate decisions.

Author: Weber, Richard M.
Publisher: American Society of CLU
Publication Name: Journal of the American Society of CLU & ChFC
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1052-2875
Year: 1993
Analysis, Training, Insurance agents

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Keeping faith with policyholders: guidelines for companies and producers

Article Abstract:

Companies and producers seeking to build customer trust, a vital business asset, should be willing to make more disclosures about discretionary aspects than is often the case. A life insurance company's point-of-sale illustration disclosure should indicate whether interest rates are gross or net, whether they are based on portfolio or new money allocations, and how such disclosures influence policies. Producers should discuss downside estimates and be willing to reveal their compensation structure.

Author: Schwartz, Richard A.
Publisher: American Society of CLU
Publication Name: Journal of the American Society of CLU & ChFC
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1052-2875
Year: 1995
United States, Insurance industry, Public relations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Risks involved in the sale of life insurance to multiple employer welfare benefit plans

Article Abstract:

Multiple employer welfare benefit plans being marketed to professional corporations and closely held business are designed to defer income taxes, but risk forfeiture of contributions or imposition of a 100 % excise tax. To avoid deduction limitations, the plan must qualify under Section 419A(f)(6), which may require forfeitures. Most plans fail to meet the discrimination test under Section 505(b) which subject the employer to a 100 % excise tax on benefits paid.

Author: Culhane, Floyd C., Jr.
Publisher: American Society of CLU
Publication Name: Journal of the American Society of CLU & ChFC
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1052-2875
Year: 1992
Employee benefits

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Marketing, Life insurance, Disclosure (Insurance), Management
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Cost disclosure versus concept disclosure: a personal perspective. Informed consent
  • Abstracts: A human rights critique of the WTO: some preliminary observations. "The times they are a'changin'": some preliminary thoughts on developing countries, NGOs and the reform of the WTO
  • Abstracts: Disputing distributions in a shrinking commons: the case of drought in California. This bird has flown: the uncertain fate of wildlife on closed military bases
  • Abstracts: Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: evidence from the U.S. federal courts. Reversion taxes, contingent benefits, and the decline in pension funding
  • Abstracts: Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: evidence from the U.S. federal courts. part 2 The impact of gun laws on police deaths
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.