Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Discount for minority general partnership interest allowed

Article Abstract:

The Tax Court found in Estate of Barudin, a memorandum opinion, that a one-ninety-fifth general partnership interest in a real estate partnership was entitled to a 45% discount for lack of marketability and lack of control as a minority interest. The estate had argued for a combined discount of 67.5%, and the IRS had valued the discount at 28%. The Court used market data to impute a minority interest discount of 19%, and it found the lack of marketability discount to be 26% because one individual controlled a majority of the partnership interests and could veto any transfers.

Author: Madden, Robert E., Schlenger, Jacques T., Edgar, John P.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Estate Planning
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-1794
Year: 1997
Partnership Interests, Partnership, Partnerships, Decedents' estates, Valuation, Discount (Finance)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Surviving spouse's disclaimer reduced marital deduction

Article Abstract:

The Tax Court in Estate of Nix, Sr. ruled that a surviving spouse's disclaimer of certain willed assets reduced the value of the marital deduction allowed the estate. The spouse had hoped to make a transaction legal under the unified credit equivalent, but the court ruled that the original will stipulated that the estate value and marital deduction be recalculated in the event of any disclaimers. As such, the disclaimer reduced the marital deduction while raising the taxable value of the estate.

Author: Madden, Robert E., Schlenger, Jacques T., Edgar, John P.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Estate Planning
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-1794
Year: 1996
Public Finance Activities, Tax Deductions & Exemptions, Estate Planning, Cases, Tax deductions, Marital deduction

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Reformation was not available for CRT under 1978 will

Article Abstract:

The US District Court in New Jersey ruled in Estate of Reddert that the estate was not entitled to a charitable deduction because the charitable remainder trust created by a pour-over will could not be reformed. The latest date for reformation under the law applicable to the trust and will was Dec. 31, 1981, and the court was unwilling to allow application of IRC section 2055(e)(2)(C), which had been enacted in 1984. The court relied on the date of death and the date of trust formation.

Author: Madden, Robert E., Schlenger, Jacques T., Edgar, John P.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Estate Planning
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-1794
Year: 1996
Taxation, Charitable remainder trusts, Wills, Reformation of instruments

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Towards a constructive public-private partnership to enforce competition law. State action as a defence against 81 and 82 EC
  • Abstracts: Firm commitments: lawyers cannot ignore duty to report ethics violations by colleagues. Separating customer and client: law-related services may not be exempt from ethics rules
  • Abstracts: Amicus networking add-on. $hopper's guide to personal information managers
  • Abstracts: Crash course in Windows; Microsoft's newest operating system may not always be the best choice. Internet: who needs it? Law office managers must set policy for online access and limitations
  • Abstracts: Women's progress slows at top firms: numbers in partnership ranks do grow, but hurdles remain, and not all partners are created equal
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.