Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Disparate impact reference trilogy for statistics

Article Abstract:

Disparate impact for job discrimination is defined statistically using three references. Various federal employee selection guidelines use an 80% rule though allow for discrimination occurring when this rule is met if separate hiring practices have a lower diversity rate. US Supreme Court cases state that individual practices can be discriminatory even when the overall hiring shows no disparate impact. The 1991 Civil Rights Act focuses on specific not overall processes. Discrimination can be determined through a threshold test and a barriers test using binomial statistics or applicant data depending on the findings.

Author: Biddle, Richard E.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The role of two statistical approaches to EEO cases

Article Abstract:

Employment discrimination cases can be tried with hypergeometric or binomial statistics. As both produce a standard deviation and a probability to determine statistical significance, both can be used in disparate impact analyses. Disparate impact can be analyzed by threshold, by barrier and by selection and these statistical distributions can be useful with all three. After adverse impact is demonstrated, the employer can prove validity, and the plaintiff has a chance to show if there is another practice with less adverse impact that will meet the employer's legitimate needs.

Author: Biddle, Richard E.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1996
Statistics, Statistics (Data)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Statistics in corporate downsizing cases: unfulfilled promise for plaintiffs

Article Abstract:

Practical application of lessons found in 38 Federal Circuit Court of Appeals cases dealing with the use of statistics in corporate downsizing employment discrimination cases is possible. Employees use of employers' statistics is often not possible because of the lack of or self-serving statistical record-keeping. Available statistics should be presented in specific ways but cannot be relied upon to satisfy plaintiffs' burdens of persuasion that employers' reasons for disparities are pretextual.

Author: O'Connor, Jennifer M.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1997
Usage, Downsizing (Management), Evidence, Statistical, Statistical evidence (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Testimony, Employment discrimination
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Arbitration improves the justice system. The role of arbitration in the field of patent law. Intellectual property disputes: arbitrating the creative
  • Abstracts: The ABC's of EMG. The use of class actions in personal injury cases. Ex parte contacts with plaintiffs' treating physicians
  • Abstracts: Gang busters; prosecutors are turning to powerful federal statutes and some handy local ordinances to stop criminal gangs in their tracks
  • Abstracts: The private sector in perspective - 1994/95. Threat of surge in pay settlements recedes. The private sector in perspective - 1995/96
  • Abstracts: Pay prospects for 1996/97 - a survey of the private sector. Economic outlook for 1996/97. Economic outlook for 1995/96
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.