Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Do we really need criminal and civil penalties for contraventions of directors' duties?

Article Abstract:

Australia's Corporations Law part 9.4B is a proper regime for criminal and civil penalties to punish directors' breach of duties. Civil penalties are created by 9.4B, with a maximum fine of $200,000 besides possible exclusion from corporate management. Both the criminal and civil measures are just, effective and necessary. A wide range of response is facilitated, which enables a balance of business regulation and suppport for legitimate business activity.

Author: Gething, Michael
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1996
Discipline

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A spanner in the works: the impact of Mesenberg v Cord Industrial Recruiters on enforcement rights under the Corporations Law

Article Abstract:

The New South Wales Supreme Court narrowed the remedies available to shareholders against corporate directors in Mesenberg v. Cord Industrial Recruiters Pty. The Court found that Part 9.4B of the Corporations Law was the exclusive source of civil remedies. The ruling would serve to limit the rights of shareholders, but the decision can be attacked on a number of grounds, including remedy, standing and policy issues.

Author: Bird, Helen
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1997
Cases, Stockholders' derivative actions, Shareholder lawsuits, Fiducia

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The duties of Australian institutional investors in relation to corporate governance

Article Abstract:

Australian investors are legally obligated to trustees and other fiduciary office holders to exercise their powers with genuine consideration, but shortcomings exists in the law concerning this duty. Law reform could remedy some of these shortcomings. Requiring compulsory voting by institutional stockholders, however, would not resolve the problems.

Author: Stapledon, G.P.
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1998
Powers and duties, Investors

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Interpretation and construction, Australia, Laws, regulations and rules, Corporate directors, Corporate governance, Corporation law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Constitutional structure and judicial deference to agency interpretations of agency rules. Informational standing under the NEPA: justiciability and the environmental decisionmaking process
  • Abstracts: Lost in the myths of crime: the use of penal custody for male juveniles, 1969 to 1993
  • Abstracts: The last word debate: how social and political forces shape constitutional values. At the halfway point: light docket makes it hard to read trends in Supreme Court decisions
  • Abstracts: The quality of medicaid data for HIV/AIDS research: examination of a statewide Data Base. Informed consent to AIDS-vaccine trials in Brazil: a pilot study
  • Abstracts: The rhetoric of results and the results of rhetoric: judicial writings. What's an opinion for?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.