Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Domino's Pizza delivers ... a blow to franchisee tying claims

Article Abstract:

Franchisees' standing to make tying and other antitrust claims remains unsettled after Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. The US 3d Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the federal district court's decision which distinguished the case from Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services by the cases' differing relevant product markets. The court stated the claims were in contract and did not fall under federal antitrust law. The US Eastern District Court in Louisiana later certified a class of franchisees making federal tying claims but it can be distinguished from Queen City.

Author: Wieczorek, Dennis E., Lockerby, Michael J., Baer, John R.F.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Franchise Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 8756-7962
Year: 1997
Antitrust law, Tying agreements, Tying arrangements

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The trend otherwise continues

Article Abstract:

Franchisees have been unsuccessful in several state and federal cases where they have asserted that franchisors had breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Some cases concern franchisors selling new franchises or purchasing competing businesses in areas which the franchisees consider to be their territory but for which the franchise contracts are silent. Termination of franchise cases have resulted in the same judicial rejection of the implied covenant and assertion of express franchise contractual terms.

Author: Wieczorek, Dennis E., Lockerby, Michael J., Baer, John R.F.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Franchise Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 8756-7962
Year: 1997
Good faith (Law), states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Class actions

Article Abstract:

A US District court certified a class action in the 1996 International Dairy Queen decision, holding the case met all class action thresholds and that class treatment would the best way to adjudicate the matter. The defendants' claims concerning state law applicability and other issues precluding class treatment were discounted by the court, which instead found a predominance of common issues and that a class action was proper since the case was primarily a damages action.

Author: Lockerby, Michael J., Modell, Charles S., Lokker, Ellen R.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Franchise Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 8756-7962
Year: 1997
Class actions (Civil procedure), Class action lawsuits, Laws, regulations and rules

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Commercial law, Franchises
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Broadening access to financial services- Competing imperatives. Independence and accountability of the People's Bank of China: A legal perspective
  • Abstracts: Exemptions for experienced franchisors and knowledgeable franchisees: law and policy. Application of U.S. franchise laws to international franchise sales
  • Abstracts: Supporting organizations: a good alternative to private foundations. Planning to preserve the advantages of community property
  • Abstracts: Deck chairs rearranged: the final Cottage Savings regulations. The Treasury's debt modification regulations: Cottage Savings proves a perilous beacon
  • Abstracts: Turning users on to technology: hurdles of law tech evangelists. Legal tech grows more complex, and so do tech hiring decisions
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.