Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Don't tell juries about statutory damage caps: the merits of nondisclosure

Article Abstract:

Many federal and state courts are subject to laws prohibiting jury notification that the amount of money they may award for non-economic damages is subject to a statutory cap. Such laws stem from concerns that notifying a jury of a damage cap might exert an influence on the amount of the award unrelated to the facts of the case. Courts not subject to laws prohibiting jury notification should adopt a policy of nondisclosure with the aim of preventing the distortion of jury awards.

Author: Kang, Michael S.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1999
Interpretation and construction, Laws, regulations and rules, Instructions to juries, Jury instructions, Limitation of damages, Limitations of damages

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Shareholder litigation under indeterminate corporate law

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the value of determinacy in corporate law and explores sources of indeterminacy and suggests that increased enforcement and lesser sanctions may increase determinacy. The author argues that liability and indemnification insurance coverage for corporate directors and officers is a cost-efficient method to encourage necessary litigation.

Author: Kamar, Ehud
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1999
Evaluation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The first thing we do, let's pay all the lawyers

Article Abstract:

The author comments upon the arguments made in this Symposium issue by Ehud Kamar concerning increasing determinacy in corporate law by encouraging stockholder derivative suits and by using directors' and officers' liability insurance. The author believes Kamar's arguments are interesting, but unlikely to survive empirical study.

Author: Mahoney, Paul G.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1999
Economic aspects, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Criticism and interpretation, Kamar, Ehud

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Analysis, Influence, Corporation law, Stockholders' derivative actions, Shareholder lawsuits, Directors' and officers' liability insurance, Legal formalism
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: From the universities to the marketplace: the business ethics journey. From the business ethics course to the sustainable curriculum
  • Abstracts: Institutionalization of ethics: the perspective of managers. Exploitation or choice? Exploring the relative attractiveness of employment in the maquiladoras
  • Abstracts: Inclusion of sexual orientation discrimination in the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. Reeves v. Sanderson: United States Supreme Court attempts to clarify plaintiff's burden in 'ADEA' claims
  • Abstracts: The regulation of social meaning. Economic regulation and democratic government. The law of the horse: what cyberlaw might teach
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.