Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Economics, academia, and corporate money: justice for sale in America

Article Abstract:

Corporate-funded foundations and societies, such as the Olin Foundation and the Federalist Society, are working to indoctrinate judges and young lawyers into believing that the best interests of big business are synonymous with the best interests of American society. Free seminars on economics, such as the Law & Economics Center, have been used to teach a majority of the federal judiciary that regulation is harmful to the economy. While economic analysis does have a place in some judicial decision-making, the economic justice concerns of the American public and Pres. Clinton will mean nothing if laws will not be enforced by the courts.

Author: Aron, Nan, Moulton, Barbara, Owens, Chris
Publisher: Antitrust Law & Economics Review, Inc.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 1992
Judges, Training, Corporations, Nonprofit organizations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Economics, academia, and corporate money in America: the 'law and economics' movement

Article Abstract:

Corporate influence on academia has increased through the funding of law and economics programs at many law schools. The funding has been funneled through organizations such as the Olin Foundation that are committed to shifting societal views in favor of big business. The top law schools in the US all receive funding that encourages a particular brand of law and economics theory that devalues justice and morality issues in the law. Well-financed seminars on law and economics have also been made available to many US judges.

Author: Aron, Nan, Moulton, Barbara, Owens, Chris
Publisher: Antitrust Law & Economics Review, Inc.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 1992
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Chicago school of economics, Monetarism, John M. Olin Foundation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Revision of the Justice/FTC merger guidelines: the new 'efficiency' defense

Article Abstract:

The two US agencies enforcing corporate governance standards, the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice, give the doctrine that merger leads to efficiency as a reason to approve otherwise anticompetitive combinations. The idea of an 'efficient monopoly', is, however, an oxymoron, since monopoly is the root cause of inefficiency, as no less an authority than Adam Smith has stated.

Author: Pitofsky, Robert, Klein, Joel I.
Publisher: Antitrust Law & Economics Review, Inc.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 1997
Standards, United States, Acquisitions and mergers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Political activity, Political aspects, Law and economics, Law and economics (Jurisprudence)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Public pension fund activism in corporate governance reconsidered
  • Abstracts: Employment law: employers' exposure for dismissal in Canada. Defamation in employment: suits by "at will" employees
  • Abstracts: Commercial power and competitor litigation. Choice of law in tort in domestic and international litigation. The court-room economist in Australian antitrust litigation: an underutilised resource?
  • Abstracts: The final work on excusable neglect? A dinosaur, a citadel and a dogma: implied warranties of goods in mixed transactions
  • Abstracts: Environmental law in Australia and the United States: a comparative overview. Environmental regulation in Michigan and Massachusetts: two states with two different solutions to the same problem
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.