Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Elder rights boosted with new law: specific mental 'deficits' to govern competency decisions in California

Article Abstract:

A new California law is the country's first to specify factors judges should consider in determining the mental competency of individuals, especially the elderly. Los Angeles practitioner Marc b. Hankin led the effort to pass the Due Process in Competence Determinations Act, which took effect on Jan 1, 1996. The law emphasizes function over the presence of an ailment or condition, so specific deficits must be proven by clear and convincing evidence to appointing a conservator. Some critics doubt the law will be effective, noting its vague wording.

Author: Reuben, Richard C.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
Laws, regulations and rules, Medical care decision-making authority (Law), Medical care decision making authority (Law), Capacity and disability

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A man with a mission: California law prof touts state civil procedure courses

Article Abstract:

William Slomanson has called for increased emphasis on state civil procedure in law school. The professor, who teaches at Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego, is teaching an elective course in California procedure and has written the first casebook on the subject. Few law schools offer classes in state civil procedure, and most state bar exams do not cover state civil procedure. Some opponents of the idea state that legal education is an education in critical thinking and not vocational training.

Author: Reuben, Richard C.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools, Colleges and universities, First Professional Degrees, Curricula, Study and teaching, Law schools, Academic degrees, Civil procedure, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Family fundamentals: justices tackle a child custody case with more than parental rights at stake

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court has in M.L.B. v. S.L.J. the opportunity to clarify the constitutional nature of parent-child relations. Lawyers for the estranged wife are arguing that in view of the fundamental nature of parent-child relations, constitutional rights mandate that the court permit her to proceed with an appeal in forma pauperis to counter the husband's attempt to terminate her parental rights.

Author: Reuben, Richard C.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
United States, Cases, Parent and child (Law), Custody of children, Child custody

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: California
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Helping lawyers cope with new legal market. Helping to protect rights in new technologies. Helping lawyers resolve complex merger issues
  • Abstracts: Edited comments concerning differentiating action and expression in a virtual world
  • Abstracts: Disciplinary rules: the relevance of disciplinary rules to the fairness of dismissal. Contract, confidentiality and the public interest
  • Abstracts: Intel inside? The poor lawyer's guide to upgrading your computer. Dealing with data obsolescence
  • Abstracts: Directors under the spotlight: corporate governance update. Stock mergers in a volatile market. Three's a crowd - observations on the mating dance among announced merger partners and an unsolicited second bidder
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.