Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Employee's objection to substantial detrimental changes

Article Abstract:

The European Court of Justice's (ECJ) 1996 Merckx case ruling says that the EC Business Transfers Directive requires Member States to hold employers responsible for employee terminations due to substantial detrimental changes, including relocation. The Directive also requires Member States to determine the disposition of the affected employment contract and does not preclude employee objections to relocation, according to the ECJ. The decision implies that employees can terminate contracts because of detrimental changes without any actual contractual breach.

Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1996
Employee relocation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Redundancy payment deducted after "Polkey reduction." (United Kingdom)

Article Abstract:

The UK's Employment Appeal Tribunal decision in the 1996 Digital case held that, in calculating an unfair dismissal compensatory award for a redundant employee, the redundancy payment must be deducted after the so-called "Polkey reduction." An industrial tribunal failed to follow this formula by deducting the redundancy payment first, a mistake which, in effect, credited Digital for only 50% of the required contractual redundancy pay rather than the full amount. The differences between this holding and the rulings in similar cases are discussed.

Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1996
Damages, Damages (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: United Kingdom, Cases, Employee dismissals, Employment terminations, Employment at will
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Employment protection rights. Contractual and employment protection issues. Part-timer's dismissal complaint out of time
  • Abstracts: Is the camel's nose in the social security tent? Where are the savings? Where's the growth?
  • Abstracts: Pollution exclusion puts unwary insureds at risk; the application of environmental clauses to unrelated areas of coverage is catalyst for litigation
  • Abstracts: Lack of consultation made redundancy selection unfair. Apprentice cannot be dismissed for redundancy
  • Abstracts: A critical assessment of intracorporate loss shifting after prosecutions based on corporate wrongdoing. Beyond Aronson: recent Delaware cases on demand futility
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.