Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Employment law; at-will limitations

Article Abstract:

Federal courts have started to use civil rights statutes dating from the Reconstruction Era to limit at-will employment. An at-will employee was permitted by the Supreme Court's Haddle v. Garrison ruling to sue for damages under 42 USC 1985 (2) in a case in which there was an alleged conspiracy to have him fired. Employees are able through cases like these to get around at-will employment and maintain what in essence is a wrongful-termination lawsuit against a private employer under the guise of a federal civil rights violation.

Author: Starr, Michael
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
Labor contracts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Companies that fire employees accused of sexual harassment can usually avoid wrongful-termination liability if they show a good-faith belief in the act occurred

Article Abstract:

Good faith in terminating an employee accused of harassment, has become the controlling factor in determining the validity of wrongful termination suits that often follow. The 'just cause' standard which embodies the 'good faith' test has been adhered to by the Supreme Courts of Washington, Nevada, New York and New Mexico.

Author: Siniscalco, Gary R.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Legal services, Attorneys, Offices of Lawyers, Regulation, Licensing, and Inspection of Miscellaneous Commercial Sectors, Labor Regulation & Services, Investigations, Lawyers, Labor law, Sexual harassment, Labor policy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Terminate workers carefully; counsel for clients that reduce their work forces must tell them how to minimize risk and liability

Article Abstract:

Guidelines for employee dismissals are discussed. Even oral statements and employee handbooks can be ruled to create binding contracts. so the absence of a labor contract in writing does not mean the existence of an at-will employment relationship. Special guidelines for reductions-in-force are also given.

Author: Lester, Martha L., Hollender, Lauren M.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2001

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Employee dismissals, Employment terminations, Employment at will
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Dealing with religious freedom in the workplace; employees must be able to observe their faith, within limits
  • Abstracts: When bondholders' votes upset a plan. Effect of participant's insolvency unclear; litigation continues as to whether creditors can reach plan interests
  • Abstracts: Condo suits can involve high stakes; housing defects. CGL policy is not a panacea for employee claims; courts are apt to uphold denial of personal-injury coverage for liability related to employment
  • Abstracts: The perils of CEO depositions; avoidance, limitation and, finally, preparation are warranted when discovery embroils the boss
  • Abstracts: Triggering coverage under an "awareness clause" of a claims-made liability policy. The changing role of liability insurance: contract of indemnity or source of compensation?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.