Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

FDA prescribes cautious labels; increasingly, dietary supplement and food manufacturers are allowed to make health claims, but FDA regulations are still tight

Article Abstract:

Historically, the Food and Drug Administration has restricted health-related food labeling, even on dietary supplements, with the argument that such claims amounted to classifying such products as unapproved new drugs. Amendments to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act in 1990 and 1994, however, made it possible for food labels to give health benefits. In 1990, this was the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act and in 1994, Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act. It is clear that the boundaries for dietary supplement advertising have been extended.

Author: Hahn, Martin J., Kushner, Gary Jay, Bruce, Andrea M.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Food industry, Labeling

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Courage, Mr. Clinton: regulate, don't haggle

Article Abstract:

The cigarette industry must not be allowed both immunity from lawsuits and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation, although it may be helpful to grant the industry immunity in return for accepting FDA regulatory oversight. FDA regulation has not killed two other dangerous products, cars and liquor, and cigarettes would survive as well. Other reasons the industry gives for the evasion of FDA jurisdiction are misguided as well. Cigarettes are a dangerous consumer product and regulation is long overdue.

Author: Kluger, Richard
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Cigarettes, Cigarette Manufacturing, Health aspects, Smoking

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Tobacco bill may undo deal; flaws may spark industry litigation; U.S. taxpayers could be on the hook

Article Abstract:

Lawmakers drafted the McCain tobacco bill, approved by the US Senate Commerce Committee on Apr 1, 1998, on the assumption that any comprehensive solution needed the agreement of the tobacco companies to take effect. Although the bill is much tougher on cigarette manufacturers than the agreement reached June 20, 1997, by the tobacco industry, a group of class action lawyers and 40 state attorneys general the industry has so far stressed its constitutional problems. The constitutional objections are listed.

Author: Van Voris, Bob
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Product liability, Products liability, Tobacco

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, United States. Food and Drug Administration, Tobacco industry
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Despite the Supreme Court's 'Kodak' ruling, manufacturers continue to fend off ISO's claims of Sherman Act violations in aftermarkets for parts and service
  • Abstracts: Fairness opinion issues: anything but routine; even when investment bankers do not negotiate a deal, their fairness opinions may be vital
  • Abstracts: Courts, Congress re-examine nondrug products; makers of dietary supplements now can tout health benefits with less FDA interference
  • Abstracts: IRS rules on 401(k) definition of disposition of substantially all assets used in a trade or business
  • Abstracts: Memoir on the founding of the Journal. Taft and Hartley vindicated: the curious history of review of labor arbitration awards
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.