Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

FTC staff report: competition policy in the new high-tech, global marketplace: executive summary and principal conclusions

Article Abstract:

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) will continue to consider efficiency justifications as a component of its merger analysis, and it will pursue forming a task force with the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice to better integrate efficiency issues into the 1992 Merger Guidelines. The FTC does not support expanding the defense available to failing firms or companies in distressed industries. The FTC is also investigating new theories such as the innovation market theory that are arising as a result of accelerated technology and globalization.

Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1996
Reports, international

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Market power in the presence of an installed base

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court's decision in Eastman Kodak Co v. Image Technical Services Inc has brought antitrust attention to the issue of market power when an installed base exists. Kodak lost a claim that it had no market power in an aftermarket for parts and services, and thus no effect on competition. However, it is possible for market power to exist with an installed base and yet not affect competition. Antitrust claims may prevail in such circumstances if there are high costs of switching or a locked-in consumer population.

Author: Kattan, Joseph
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1993
Analysis, Economic aspects, Market share

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The role of efficiency considerations in the Federal Trade Commission's antitrust analysis

Article Abstract:

The Federal Trade Commission's analysis in California Dental Association marks a return to sound procedures for considering efficiency justifications for mergers. The Commission has lamented that efficiency predictions are difficult to disprove, but they are also difficult for merging parties to prove. The best approach is to allow parties to claim efficiency benefits as an affirmative defense to claims that a merger will have anticompetitive effects.

Author: Kattan, Joseph
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1996
Acquisitions and mergers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Investigations, Antitrust law, United States. Federal Trade Commission
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Separate paths: in their quest to win tech market, Gateway and Hewlett-Packard show different colors. The wonder of Wiki: a collaboration tool reminiscent of the Internet's old days finds new glory
  • Abstracts: Disintermediation: the hidden danger of the annuity market. Demographic and financial characteristics of small business owners
  • Abstracts: Antitrust policy in aftermarkets. Demand elasticities in antitrust analysis. A quality-signaling rationale for aftermarket tying
  • Abstracts: Corporate counsel can track costs via computer: programs use powerful engines to help general counsel monitor and budget outside legal costs
  • Abstracts: Constitution provides no right to be killed. Defense of marriage - or attack on family? Assisted suicide is a federal case
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.