Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

FTC takes the initiative with Hart-Scott-Rodino; innovations in the antitrust laws proposed by the commission should streamline its processes

Article Abstract:

The Federal Trade Commission and the Dept of Justice's Antitrust Division have sought in recent months to reduce the costs to business of merger enforcement. On Mar 23 they released a revised model second request with deadlines, improved procedures and an appeal process. On July 21 the FTC proposed five changes in the Hart-Scott-Rodino filing requirements, exempting various transactions. On July 22 it declared that it no longer demands prior approval in consent orders, and administrative litigation will see less use.

Author: Varney, Christine A.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
United States. Federal Trade Commission, United States. Department of Justice. Antitrust Division

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Fraudulent conveyance laws can nullify buyouts; if intentional or constructive fraud is found, a bankruptcy court will void leveraged deals

Article Abstract:

Such high-risk transactions as leveraged buyouts necessitate an independent opinion on the company's capital adequacy, evaluating both the balance-sheet and the cash-flow tests posed by the Bankruptcy Code. These precautions make more difficult any eventual fraudulent conveyance suits should the business later fail. A successful suit under fraudulent conveyance laws, allowed up to six years after the initial transaction, makes secured lenders, sellers, directors, and perhaps their agent liable to unsecured creditors.

Author: Preiser, David, Collins, Kevin
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Leveraged buyouts, Fraudulent conveyances

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Control-share laws may miss the mark

Article Abstract:

Control-share statutes have not proven effective in derailing corporate takeovers. Though the statutes are designed to limit the voting rights of an acquirer, the acquirer may exercise a rule requiring a special stockholders' meeting in order to approve those voting rights. The target may opt out of the control-share statute but should do so before the takeover bid commences, as the bidder may argue successfully that opting out after the takeover bid impairs the shareholders' franchise.

Author: Tucker, Roy W., Angius, Christopher W.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Corporate anti-takeover measures, Antitakeover strategies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Acquisitions and mergers
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: FTC clarifies Hart-Scott-Rodino filings for LLCs; because the rules still favor partnerships, merging parties should plan deals carefully
  • Abstracts: Putting the "law" back into environmental law. Why states, not EPA, should set pollution standards. Why states, not the EPA should set pollution standards
  • Abstracts: Inconsistency and impunity in international human rights law: Can the International Criminal Court solve the problems raised by the Rwanda and Augusto Pinochet cases
  • Abstracts: Ethics and the attorney as mediator or third party neutral. Charitable foundations in corporate reorganizations: insurers can learn from the thrift industry
  • Abstracts: The status-production sideshow: why the antidiscrimination laws are still a mistake. Out of the frying pan or into the fire? Race and choice of venue after Rodney King
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.