Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Failed mergers lead to suits; former partners at Arter & Hadden claim firm didn't keep its promises

Article Abstract:

The Cleveland OH law firm of Arter and Hadden faces two lawsuits due to failed mergers. These suits were filed by former partners in law firms that merged with Arter and Hadden and allege fraud, breach of a partnership agreement and misrepresentation. Counterclaims allege that these lawyers used Arter and Hadden staff for their own business interests and failed to bill for work performed for the firm. Most failed law firm mergers do not result in litigation, but sources state that attorneys have departed Arter and Hadden on unfriendly terms before.

Author: Hansen, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Arter and Hadden L.L.P.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


If the claim doesn't fit; more courts police lawyers' opening, closing statements

Article Abstract:

A new study of argument abuses in civil suits performed on behalf of the Center for Civil Justice Studies contends that these are common enough that judges have become willing to draw the line. Statements unfairly inflammatory and prejudicial would be an example. The study finds Florida's judges especially vigilant, citing several instances where new trials were ordered due to abuses. Pretrial orders that lawyers not raise certain issues are another method of discipline.

Author: Hansen, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
United States, Management, Trial practice, Forensic oratory

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Goodwill and free will; New York's highest court holds that goodwill can be a partnership asset - if the contract permits it

Article Abstract:

New York has become one of the group of states which regard the goodwill value of a law firm as a distributable asset when the firm is dissolved. The New York ruling in Dawson v. White & Case came in mid-October 1996, while the first ruling was by the Ohio Supreme Court in 1985. The New York court also made clear, however, that law firms which state or imply in their partnership agreement that goodwill has no value will not have to pay it.

Author: Hansen, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Economic aspects, Attorneys, Goodwill (Business), New York (State), states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Law firms, Lawyers
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Are E-mails enough for DOJ case? (Department of Justice's antitrust case against Microsoft). Relief in 'Microsoft.'
  • Abstracts: Now that it's over; winners and losers in the confirmation process. Where was the crucible? The cross-examination that wasn't
  • Abstracts: Gifts made under power of attorney were excludable from estate. Donor's retained control caused incomplete gift, rules Tax Court
  • Abstracts: Law firm mergers dwindle; but acquiring practice groups remains popular. Former Gaston partners revolt; 'war' seen with trustee
  • Abstracts: Against death but for profit; Bay Area has nation's only private firm focused on death-row appeals. MoFo argues against sanctions
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.