Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Relief in 'Microsoft.'

Article Abstract:

The DC Circuit's review of Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson's Microsoft is discussed. Despite the press reports, the case has merely been remanded to the district court for another ruling on a remedy, and the appellate court observed that divestiture remains the most important of the antitrust remedies.

Author: Balto, David
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2001
Corporate divestiture, Divestiture

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Are E-mails enough for DOJ case? (Department of Justice's antitrust case against Microsoft)

Article Abstract:

The Microsoft antitrust trial seems to be going well for the Department of Justice, although the latter's charges of illegal monopolization have a heavy burden of proof. There is evidence of Microsoft's purported intent to monopolize the Windows 95 client market and its warnings to Netscape to stay away, but intent is not evidence for this type of antitrust charge.On another front, Microsoft signed off on exclusionary contracts designed to crush Netscape, such as its agreement with America Online to promote Internet Explorer exclusively.

Author: Donovan, Karen
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Unfair competition (Commerce), Unfair competition

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


For the defense, Microsoft's Neukom; after government rests, general counsel responds

Article Abstract:

William H Neukom, Microsoft's general counsel, states that the government has failed to prove its case that Microsoft has a monopoly in the computer system operating market and in fact has to contend with relentless competition in the computer industry. Microsoft filed a motion to dismiss when the government finished presenting its case, stating that the government presented no evidence that Microsoft foreclosed the ability of competing vendors to sell their Web-browsing software.

Author: Donovan, Karen
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
Prepackaged software, Software Publishers, Applications Software Pkgs (Micro), Management, Applications software, Neukom, William H.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Microsoft Corp., Antitrust law, MSFT, Monopolies
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The verdict is unanimous; e-mail is becoming a necessary component of case management software. A lawyers' time does matter
  • Abstracts: In living color: the HP Jornada 548 PDA's bright color screen and applications meet attorny needs. Shootout in the handheld corral: Handspring Visor Deluxe vs. Palm Vx
  • Abstracts: Double speak: two reviewers share their opinions on Dragon NaturallySpeaking voice recognition software. When presentation is everything: Dreamweaver and GoLive go head-to-head to get you on the Web
  • Abstracts: McVeigh is gone, and already forgotten; execution opponents see gains coming in Congress, high court. The best defense... rebuilding clients' lives to keep them from coming back
  • Abstracts: Court trims Congress' sails on immigrants; key 5-4 rulings reduce harshness of government action. Affirmative action returns to center court; amid war talk, justices begin 2001 term
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.