Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Federal securities arbitration: does it provide adequate relief?

Article Abstract:

Recent cases suggests arbitration can provide adequate relief to investors who are involved in federal securities investment disputes. This counters the long-held assumption that investors are not likely to be adequately compensated in such cases and are restricted in their avenues of recourse. While it is true that arbitrators have historically been more kind to big business, including securities firms, than small-time investors who lose their life savings, statistics show that more investors are receiving what they consider just awards from arbitrators. The case history and federal laws surrounding the issue are discussed.

Author: Weibel, Mark
Publisher: American Arbitration Association
Publication Name: Arbitration Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-7893
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Florida's motor vehicle arbitration board - a two-year review

Article Abstract:

The Florida New Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board has proven beneficial to consumers since its inception in 1989. The board is charged with implementing the state's lemon law. While arbitration has helped resolve many complaints, there are some flaws. Consumers often fail to successfully present their cases, not realizing they must do more than demonstrate a defect. Manufacturers also have problems with the procedure. Arbitrator effectiveness can also be improved through better training.

Author: Adams, Ronald J.
Publisher: American Arbitration Association
Publication Name: Arbitration Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-7893
Year: 1992
Florida, Social policy, New York, Automobile lemon laws, Lemon laws

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Assessing fairness in securities industry arbitration

Article Abstract:

The large number of broker-investor disputes in the 1980s put securities arbitration in the spotlight, with several criticisms emerging. The main issues are: mandatory arbitration clauses in securities contracts, the makeup of panels, alleged arbitrariness of decisions, and confusion regarding punitive damages.

Author: Styrcula, Keith A.
Publisher: American Arbitration Association
Publication Name: Arbitration Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-7893
Year: 1991
Evaluation, Dispute resolution (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Securities arbitration
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Youth curfews and the trilogy of parent, child, and state relations. Juvenile curfew: legal perspectives and beyond
  • Abstracts: Reading death sentences: the narrative construction of capital punishment. Punishment postgenocide: from guilt to shame to civis in Rwanda
  • Abstracts: Humanities and Business: Educational Reform for Corporate Success. Animal Torture in Corporate Dungeons
  • Abstracts: 80 commercial arbitration organizations: global federation serves growing need for arbitration. Survey: the speed and cost of complex commercial arbitrations
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.