Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Forum selection; case removal

Article Abstract:

The mid- to late-1990s have featured a number of federal court cases on removal jurisdiction, including diversity jurisdiction questions, using joinder for inclusion of non-diverse parties and choosing subject-matter or personal jurisdiction. Marathon Oil Co. c. Ruhrgas A.G. is a 1998 holding that a district court lacks the discretion to resolve a challenge to personal jurisdiction before ruling on an alleged lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, even when the latter is the more legally difficult issue. The decision may change standard federal practice.

Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Personal jurisdiction

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Automation comes to court: in multidistrict and complex lawsuits, computers manage documents and save money

Article Abstract:

Automation can be very useful in complex or multidistrict litigation, and all phases of the trial can benefit. Technologies which can help at both the discovery and trial stages include a document depository with all of the documents on CD-ROM and searchable with full-text-searchable software, access to document-imaging and document-coding technologies, and technologically sophisticated ways of presenting evidence such as split screen projection.

Author: Daniels, Richard L., Berry, George E.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Management, Litigation support, Complex litigation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Forum selection; multidistrict transfer

Article Abstract:

Issues regarding the procedural aspects of multidistrict litigation are discussed. Statistics show that most multidistrict cases remanded for trial or further proceedings in the district from whichh they were transferred end up being resolved by pretrial disposition or settlement. The US Supreme Court's ruling in Lexecon, Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes and Lerach L.L.P. is discussed.

Author: Vairo, Georgine
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2000
Multidistrict litigation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Removal of causes
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Drafting dispute resolution clauses in complex business transactions. Drafting arbitration clauses: avoiding the 7 deadly sins
  • Abstracts: Title VII's tangled tale: the erosion and confusion of disparate impact and the business necessity defense. The reasonable accommodation difference: the effect of applying the burden shifting frameworks developed under Title VII in disparate treatment cases to claims brought under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act
  • Abstracts: Reload stock options: impact on your shareholders, company, and executives. SEC adopts final changes to the holding period requirements of Rule 144 for resales of restricted securities
  • Abstracts: The spike in mergers is prompting U.S. courts to compel corporate parties who have not signed any arbitration agreements to arbitrate international disputes
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.