Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Paying for free speech; public university students must fund marketplace of ideas

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court ruling in Board of Regents v. Southworth that students at public universities must pay mandatory school fees even when used to fund activities they disagree with is discussed. The court rejected the First Amendment argument that conservative students did not need to fund such activities.

Author: Savage, David G.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 2000
Behavior, Public universities and colleges

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Court to hear free speech: First Amendment issue range from corporate PR to Internet porn

Article Abstract:

Several landmark cases involving free speech rights are set to appear before the US Supreme Court. Among these are the case of United States v. American Library Association, which involves a federal requirment that libraries filter Internet pornography out of their computers to receive federal funding. The case of Nike, Inc. v. Kasky involves charges that the shoe manufacturer lied about conditions in its Asian plants.

Author: Savage, David G.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 2003
Legal issues & crime, Government regulation (cont), Government regulation, Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, Legal/Government Regulation, Civic and Social Organizations, Social services, not elsewhere classified, Free Speech & Assembly, Fund Raising Agencies, Company legal issue, Laws, regulations and rules, Fund raising, Commercial speech doctrine, Internet pornography

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Freedom from forced fees; university students reject the notion of subsidizing campus groups whose views they don't share

Article Abstract:

The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth case is discussed, a case challenging on the grounds of freedom of speech the mandatory student fees which subsidize a variety of student organizations. The 7th Circuit sided with the conservative students who brought this case, while the university argued that the activity fees enriched campus life by exposing students to a variety of views.

Author: Savage, David G.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1999
Finance, College students

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Freedom of speech
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Investment remodeling; now is the time to get your financial house spiffed up for the 21st century. Perilous partnerships; investing with clients can strengthen or sour business relationships
  • Abstracts: Jurors: a biased, independent lot; an NLJ-DecisionQuest poll finds potential jurors will ignore a judge and don't like Bib Business
  • Abstracts: Using electronic technologies in the administration of qualified retirement and welfare benefit plans. Correcting errant 403(b) plans - new IRS program
  • Abstracts: A sorry 'estate' of affairs for qualified plan and IRA benefits: naming an estate as beneficiary. Asset protection for retirement plans and IRAs
  • Abstracts: Satellites expand your orbit; multiple offices offer convenience for clients and name recognition for solos. Best prepaid plans can go awry; but they offer a steady stream of clients with whom to build relationships
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.