Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Gainsharing at Owens Corning Building Products

Article Abstract:

The gain sharing scheme implemented at insulation manufacturer Owens Corning Building Products' UK plant typifies the pros and cons of this compensation method. Gain sharing allows employees to share in improved company performance, productivity, and efficiency through an agreed-upon bonus formula. Owens Corning's experience has been that gain sharing improves teamwork but has not had a major impact on overall performance. This type of scheme requires careful planning. Owens Corning's initial formula was flawed and had to replaced with a sliding-scale trigger.

Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Pay and Benefits Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0143-8328
Year: 1997
United Kingdom, Evaluation, Compensation and benefits, Insulating materials industry, Insulation industry, Gain sharing, Owens Corning. Construction Products Group

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Why are some products branded and others not?

Article Abstract:

Results of an empirical study of differences in price, service and quality at branded and unbranded service stations are consistent with consumer information theory. Consumer information theory predicts that branding of products will arise when quality matters and when the search for quality would be relatively costly to the consumer. Gasoline is a product that consumers cannot immediately determine the quality of. The higher prices at branded stations would appear to reflect a consumer preference for a product with some assertions of quality.

Author: Png, I.P.L., Reitman, David
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Journal of Law and Economics
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0022-2186
Year: 1995
Economic aspects, Service stations (Automotive), Consumer preferences, Brand name products, Brand names, Service stations (Motor vehicles)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Some realism about economic power in a time of sectorial change

Article Abstract:

Public policy and the public interest have separated with the 1990s antitrust treatment of large corporations. The microeconomic approach to antitrust regulation does not recognize the realities of power exerted by companies due to their size alone. Public and business recognition of this fact is evidenced by the concern over telecommunications mergers and mergers created by enormous entities such as Microsoft.

Author: Peritz, Rudolph J.R.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1997
Models, Competition (Economics), Antitrust law, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Microeconomics, Market share

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Cracking down on teens and taxi cabs; saying it wants to protect shoppers, mall managers incur wrath of kids and cabbies
  • Abstracts: Tax Basics of Buying and Selling a Corporation. Returning to form: untangling the tax jurisprudence of bootstrap acquisitions
  • Abstracts: Procedural and distributive justice: examining equity in a university setting. Tax avoidance and the European Court of Justice: what is at stake for European General Anti-Avoidance Rules?
  • Abstracts: The politics of infrastructure. The myth of context in politics and law. The politics of British policing in the Thatcher/Major state
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.