Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Government intervention versus disclosure: the evolution of capital market regulation in Israel

Article Abstract:

Government regulation of the capital market in Israel should only be enough to provide a structure within which a free market operates. There has been increasing pressure for more regulation since the stock exchange crash in Tel Aviv in 1983, and reforms came from the Securities Authority, the Treasury and the Bank of Israel. These reforms and new securities legislation, such as amendments to the Securities Law, have yet to be integrated into a national economic policy which guarantees growth.

Author: Sarnat, Marshall
Publisher: University of Pennsylvania
Publication Name: University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Business Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0891-9895
Year: 1992
Interpretation and construction, Capital market, Capital markets, Securities law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Is self-regulation the best option for the advertising industry in the European Union? An argument for the harmonization of advertising laws through the continued use of directives

Article Abstract:

The use of European Union directives rather than self-regulation would be a better method of harmonizing existing law for the advertising industry. The advertising industry has been lobbying to discontinue use of such directives as the Misleading Advertising and Television Broadcasting directives. However, self-regulation cannot promote the EU's goal of harmonization because it is unenforceable and cannot ensure consumer protection.

Author: Reader, Thomas W.
Publisher: University of Pennsylvania
Publication Name: University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Business Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0891-9895
Year: 1995
Europe, Political aspects, Advertising, Industry self regulation, Harmonization of laws, European Community, European advertising

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Competition in the European financial services industry: the free movement of capital versus the regulation of money laundering

Article Abstract:

The 1988 Capital Movements Directive (CMD) and the 1990 Money Laundering Directive (MLD) of the EC conflict with each other. While the CMD is intended to facilitate a unified financial services industry that is more competitive in the world, the MLD undoes many of the CMD's advantages. An example of the conflict is occurring in Luxembourg over the issue of bank secrecy.

Author: Smith, Geoffrey W.
Publisher: University of Pennsylvania
Publication Name: University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Business Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0891-9895
Year: 1992
Financial services industry, Financial services, International aspects, Money laundering, Capital movements

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Regulatory reform in transition: the telecommunications industry and MFJ regulation. The shape of competition under Title VII of the Energy Policy Act of 1992
  • Abstracts: Fragmented, incomplete, and discontinuous: the failure of federal privacy regulatory proposals and institutions
  • Abstracts: Religious freedom at a crossroads. The Resolution Trust Corporation's override regulation: freedom for intrastate branch banking
  • Abstracts: Protectionism versus free trade: implementing the GATT antidumping agreement in the United States. Binding the states: a survey of state law conformance with the standards of the GATT Procurement Code
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.