Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Grandparents' visitation rights are not ironclad; protracted legal battles over grandparent visitation are unlikely to produce the sort of benefits that children of divorce need

Article Abstract:

Despite the presence in all 50 states of statutes providing some sort of grandparent visitation with the children of divorced parents, enforcement is difficult and hinges on clear proof that harm will otherwise come to the child. Litigation over such visitation is rarely the best course, and can itself cause considerable harm to the child. Generally, states may interfere in a parent's decisions on this matter upon a showing of compelling circumstances. The evolution of Georgia's law in this regard is explored.

Author: Nissenbaum, Gerald L., Maloney, Stephen C.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Laws, regulations and rules, Visitation rights (Domestic relations), Grandparents, Georgia, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Chicago sex rule doesn't go far enough

Article Abstract:

The American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (AAML) recently implemented ethical rules. Rule 2.16 prohibits attorney-client sex during the professional relationship. The language of the Chicago Bar Association proposal on the same subject is too vague and open to differing interpretations. It states the attorney may not use 'duress, intimidation or undue influence' to start an affair with a client. Clearer language, such as that used in the AAML rule, should be adopted.

Author: Nissenbaum, Gerald L.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Social aspects, Letter to the Editor, Practice of law, Attorney and client

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


One court, one rule on ethics

Article Abstract:

Choice of law is a common problem in legal ethics matters. An increasing number of lawyers practice in more than one state, and which ethics code governs can be very important in view of the differences between state rules. The ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility has proposed an amended Model Rule 8.5 including a 'predominant effects' exception to deal with choice of ethical rule issues.

Author: Isbell, David B., Roach, Arvid E.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Analysis, Conflict of laws

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Standards, Legal ethics
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: An airline limitation device; used in the unlikely event of 'water landings,' laws cap recovery. Questions of authority; jurisdiction cases crop up as Internet sales erase borders
  • Abstracts: In vitro fertilization: insurance and consumer protection. Second best: the soft underbelly of deterrence theory in tort
  • Abstracts: Employees may recover for businesses' broken promises; more courts are now permitting at-will workers to sue their employers under the tort theory of fraudulent inducement
  • Abstracts: How to handle stock options held at an employee's death. IRS issues final regs. on treating revocable trust as part of estate
  • Abstracts: Tax-exempt affiliated health care entities treated as one employer for purposes of 401(k) grandfather rules. Separate coverage election lowers cost of group-term life benefits for employees; reinstatement of retired executives in insured s. 79 plan does not affect 1984 TRA grandfather
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.