Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Heading back to the thicket: voting district cases pose politically and racially charges questions

Article Abstract:

By agreeing to review voting district cases Shaw v. Hunt and Bush v. Vera in the 1995-96 term the US Supreme Court revisits a difficult area where its recent decisions give no clear direction. If the court extends its 5-4 decision in Miller v. Johnson and overturns more voting districts, redrawing them during an election year would be highly disruptive to the elections. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor seems to be the key vote, with her concurrence in Miller suggesting that opinion will not be broadened.

Author: Reuben, Richard C.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
Cases, Voting, Apportionment (Election law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Taking the initiative: California voters bar pain-and-suffering damages for uninsured or drunken drivers in car accidents

Article Abstract:

California voters decided in Proposition 213 that drunken drivers and uninsured motorists were ineligible for non-economic damages, including those for pain and suffering, arising from traffic accidents. The initiative is sure to have a big impact since one in three California drivers is uninsured. Critics of the initiative feel it is mean-spirited, while proponents are sure it will save a great deal of insurance costs as lawyers will have less reason to file suits under the contingency fee system.

Author: Reuben, Richard C.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Laws, regulations and rules, Remedies, California, Limitation of damages, Limitations of damages, Liability for traffic accidents, Mental distress (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Stuntpersons add drama to cases; accidents are re-created to support litigants' version of events

Article Abstract:

Some lawyers say that dramatizing an accident or injury case with a stunt actor can be visually compelling and persuasive, though not decisive. Fees for stuntpersons range up to $4000 per stunt and $1500 per day of testimony, steep figures because stunts for the courtroom permit less use of off-camera safety equipment. Lawyers hire them to illustrate a victim's claims or injury as well as for the defense, to disprove an unlikely allegation.

Author: Reuben, Richard C.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
Usage, Innovations, Personal injuries, Evidence, Demonstrative, Testimony, Demonstrative evidence, Stunt men and women, Stunt performers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Growth market in death futures spawn suits; sales of life insurance policies at a discount draw fraud charges, SEC action
  • Abstracts: A tangled web: IOLTA and the banks. Lessons from the savings and loan debacle: the case for further financial deregulation
  • Abstracts: Sickness absence. Victimisation on health and safety grounds. Two-year qualifying threshold is discriminatory
  • Abstracts: Bad faith by design: the third-party liability setup. Where there's smoke, there's fire: the absolute pollution exclusion and hostile fires
  • Abstracts: Sickness absence. Restrictive covenants binding despite unlawful termination clause
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.