Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

A tangled web: IOLTA and the banks

Article Abstract:

The June 1998 US Supreme Court decision in 'Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation' stated that the interest from bank deposits which lawyers hold for their clients rightfully belong to the clients and not to the lawyers. Supporters of the Interest on Lawyers' Trust Accounts (IOLTA) program had argued that interest on nominal deposits can be used without the knowledge and consent of the owners for socially relevant causes approved by the bar. However, the June 1998 decision reverses the rules of the game and banks and practicing lawyers can now go against the IOLTA.

Author: Moore, Cassandra
Publisher: Cato Institute
Publication Name: Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0147-0590
Year: 1998
Commercial Banks, Commercial Banking, Legal services, Attorneys, Offices of Lawyers, Lawyers, Right of property, Property rights

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Lessons from the savings and loan debacle: the case for further financial deregulation

Article Abstract:

The savings and loans crisis can be traced to excessive regulation and federal deposit insurance which was responsible for the high cost of the debacle and abuses which resulted from the government sponsored efforts to protect the industry. Some of the recommended measures to solve the problems include the application of consistent closure standards across the board for all institutions, tougher capital standards and an effective examination process enforcing the capital standards.

Author: England, Catherine
Publisher: Cato Institute
Publication Name: Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0147-0590
Year: 1992
Analysis, Deregulation, Savings and Loan Associations Bailout Crisis, 1987-

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Banking on free markets

Article Abstract:

Congress is divided on the question of whether to revise or repeal the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act that divided the banking industry into the commercial and investment banking sectors. Analysts believed that the proposal is long overdue while some congressmen are concerned that the proposal would lead to problems in the banking industry. If approved, the proposal would allow commercial banks to deal in investment products and vice versa.

Author: England, Catherine
Publisher: Cato Institute
Publication Name: Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0147-0590
Year: 1995
United States. Congress

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Banking industry, Laws, regulations and rules, Banking law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A reluctant witness ducks, then testifies; he saw a cop killing, hems and haws on testifying, and sues city for lack of protection
  • Abstracts: Article 228(2) EC and the enforcement of EC environmental law: A case of environmental justice delayed and denied? An analysis of recent legal developments
  • Abstracts: 'Anytime, anywhere, anyway;' online banking offers greater convenience and easier financial planning. Staying alive
  • Abstracts: The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act will provide state and local governments new opportunities for involvement in the legislative and regulatory process
  • Abstracts: Appellate review in executive departments and agencies. Federal administrative law judges: the relevance of past choices to future decisions
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.