Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Appellate review in executive departments and agencies

Article Abstract:

An analysis of the appellate structures of 11 federal executive departments and agencies indicates high-level political appointees should participate minimally in reviews and the judicial officer (JO) system should be used whenever appropriate. Agencies such as the EPA, Postal Service, Social Security, and cabinet departments, are best served by discretionary political review, since widespread political influence could be damaging. The JO system is preferable to review boards for cost and efficiency reasons, although boards are useful for complex or large caseloads.

Author: Weaver, Russell L.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1996
Laws, regulations and rules, Administrative procedure, Judicial review of administrative acts, Administrative remedies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Management of ALJ offices in executive departments and agencies

Article Abstract:

Their are a variety of management structures that can be used in administrative law judges' (ALJ) offices that comply with the Administrative Procedure Act, each offering different benefits. It is usually preferable to have a Chief ALJ, to insulate other ALJs from having to deal directly with non ALJs. Sometimes, such as in a small office, it is better to use a non-ALJ administrator, as long as the administrator is not a political appointee.

Author: Weaver, Russell L.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Federal administrative law judges: the relevance of past choices to future decisions

Article Abstract:

Administrative law judges have seen their caseloads change from predominately regulatory oriented proceedings to benefit oriented. The decisionmaking model Congress placed in the Administrative Procedures Act could be altered to structure the administrative adjudicatory process to meet the rise in benefits cases. Overall, the selection and performance evaluation processes regarding administrative law judges is sound.

Author: Gifford, Daniel J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1997

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Management, Practice, Administrative law, Examiners (Administrative procedure), Administrative law judges
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The year in review: significant judicial developments. Recent legislative developments affecting the work of the Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Abstracts: Tribunal liberates Victorian newsagents and sub-agents. Exercising contractual rights and imposing restrictive conditions - a misuse of market power?
  • Abstracts: Benlate winners must try again: Fla. judge orders retrials, citing victors' misconduct. Nicaraguans say they're not paying
  • Abstracts: HMO legislation is aimed at protecting patients; consumers and providers call for regulation; the managed care industry would disagree
  • Abstracts: Advocating in closing arguments: avoiding the pitfalls of reversible error. The impact of FIRREA on insurer and surety defense litigation
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.