Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Health plan cap on AIDS treatment reimbursements upheld

Article Abstract:

The Fifth Circuit has upheld the health plan cap on reimbursements for AIDS treatments. The court ruled that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act does not stop employers from making changes to group health plans to lower the maximum benefits for workers with AIDS. The case involved an employee who submitted insurance claims for AIDS treatments. The employer subsequently changed the group health plan from one that provided a lifetime maximum of $1 million in benefits for AIDS treatments to a self-insured plan that provided a maximum of $5,000.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1992
AIDS patients

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Sole owner of corporation who participates in employee benefit plan not an employee for purposes of ERISA protection

Article Abstract:

A federal district court ruled in Kelly v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield that the owner of a corporation is not an employee under ERISA. This meant that the plaintiff, a corporation owner who had been denied coverage for a bone marrow transplant to treat cancer under the company's health plan, could not file suit for breach of contract under ERISA, since corporate purchase of health benefits qualified as a contract governed by state statutes.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1993
Employee benefits

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Sixth Circuit allows class action against group health plans administered or insured by Nationwide to proceed

Article Abstract:

The US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in Fallick v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. allowed the certification of a class which alleged that ERISA violations were made by the group health plan insurer, Nationwide. The company allegedly did not provide coverage in accordance with its contract and violated ERISA-based fiduciary duties.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1999
United States, Direct Health and Medical Insurance Carriers, Hospital and medical service plans, Medical Care Insurance, Class actions (Civil procedure), Class action lawsuits, Laws, regulations and rules

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Health insurance, Group insurance
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Liability assumptions in spinoff transactions. Federal Circuit rules that allocation of earnings and profits in intra-group spin-off does not support increased basis
  • Abstracts: Storm over Niagara: a catalyst in reshaping government in the United States and Canada during the Progressive Era
  • Abstracts: Addressing the threat of punitive damages claims in franchise and dealer litigation. Litigating the "monstrous heresy": punitive damage in franchise disputes
  • Abstracts: A sneak attack on open justice. Excerpts: 7th Circuit rules on fees. 'Tjoflat' fees rule is argued in court
  • Abstracts: Proper planning can ensure automation success. Law firms look to the future. Careful planning cuts data conversion costs
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.