Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

High court is at a crossroads on takings

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court will likely hold that regulation has gone too far in two regulatory takings cases on its calendar in 1992. The present court's conservative inclinations makes likely a finding that the government has overreached its authority. The first case is Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, in which the South Carolina Supreme Court reversed a trial court order of compensation for a regulatory taking. The second case is Yee v. City of Escondido, in which a California appellate court dismissed a claim alleging that a rent control ordinance was a compensable taking.

Author: Sive, David
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Analysis, Compensation (Law), Regulatory taking (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Will Justice Ginsburg color Court green?

Article Abstract:

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joins a US Supreme Court which has not looked kindly on environmental groups for two decades. Judge Ginsburg's influence in this area is difficult to predict. Her liberality in granting standing to associations while on the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit gives some idea of how she might view claims by environmental public interest groups. Her history in granting judicial review of administrative acts also bodes well for the Court's willingness to review environmental cases.

Author: Sive, David
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Cases, Forecasts and trends, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, United States. Supreme Court, Ginsburg, Ruth Bader (American Supreme Court justice)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Standing debate continues at high court

Article Abstract:

Environmental standing could be affected by two Supreme Court decisions. The standing debate began in the 2d Circuit in 1965 with Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v Federal Power Commission and has now been addressed in the cases if Lujan v National Wildlife Federation and Lujan v Defenders of Wildlife involving land withdrawals and endangered species.

Author: Sive, David
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Interpretation and construction, Environmental aspects

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Standing (Law), Environmental law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Funding cuts spark court crisis. Dethroned 'king of porn' makes last stand in court. Court: some education claims OK
  • Abstracts: IRS issues guidance and regulations on deadlines for amending plans for certain changes in the law. IRS issues temporary guidance on issuance of determination letters
  • Abstracts: IRS Commissioner continues policies; her predecessor left big shoes for her to fill. Another paltry summer; the largest firms offer even fewer jobs
  • Abstracts: Rainmaking on the podium. Attorneys' actions set firm image; public's view. Scenario: expanding a practice; six proposals
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.