Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

History "lite" in modern American constitutionalism

Article Abstract:

The body of historical work on the US constitutional period has become sufficiently rich that constitutional legal scholars should no longer rely on generalizations and limited source materials to inform their discussions of intent of the Framers of the Constitution. Many legal scholars are guilty of the misuse of history and the reliance on English and European thought during the period instead of considering American theorists. Assumptions that early Americans were of a single mind on republican government and the Constitution demonstrate the failure to draw on the work of historians.

Author: Flaherty, Martin S.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1995
Usage, United States history, Constitutional history

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Equal citizens of equal and territorial states: the constitutional foundations of choice of law

Article Abstract:

Choice-of-law rules, which are concerned with allocation of authority among states, should be derived from constitutional principles. The relevant principles are equality of citizens, equality of states and territorial allocation of authority among states. Preference for local citizens, local law or better law, which forms the basis for much current choice-of-law method, is unconstitutional. Specific choice-of-law rules should be developed and enforced at the federal level.

Author: Laycock, Douglas
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1992
Standards, Conflict of laws, Interstate relations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The apportionment of "direct taxes": are consumption taxes constitutional?

Article Abstract:

Federal legislators considering proposals for a direct consumption or flat tax should consider the constitutional implications of such a tax. The Sixteenth Amendment apportionment rule applicable to direct taxes should apply to the proposed direct consumption tax. Sales or value-added taxes are indirect taxes which would not be subject to apportionment. The constitutionality of tax proposals should be addressed before enactment.

Author: Jensen, Erik M.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1997
Laws, regulations and rules, Consumption taxes, Taxing power

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Analysis, Interpretation and construction, Constitutional law, Constitutional interpretation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Common law constitutional interpretation. Internet service of process: a constitutionally adequate alternative?
  • Abstracts: Fiduciary duties derailed? Appropriation of directors' duties in the battle for control of Conrail. Revisiting the import of shareholder consent for corporate fiduciary loyalty obligations
  • Abstracts: Permanent life insurance benefit in connection with s. 403(b) contract considered incidental. IRS issues private letter rulings on secular trusts
  • Abstracts: Creditors, beware: juries find new basis for award; an $11 million verdict for collection abuse alarms some: it was based not on consumer law, but on common law
  • Abstracts: Using statistics to measure insurer financial strength. A rational approach to life insurer ratings. The quandary of the life insurance agent in a time of uncertainty
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.