Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

IRS's claim of 'excess parachute payments' against Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. appears to rely on an interpretation that goes against its own regulations

Article Abstract:

The IRS argues in a pending case that $443 mil of the $543 mil gain claimed by the Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp for stock options in 1992 qualified as excess parachute payments under IRC 280G or unreasonable compensation under IRC 162A and thus were not deductible. Should the IRS win this dispute, companies may need to re-examine the use of stock options to compensate employees. The IRS' second argument for denying the deduction is that it was unreasonable pay for executives.

Author: Cagney, Lawrence K., Koslowe, Jamin R.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Cases, Acquisitions and mergers, Tax deductions, COL, Employee stock options, HCA Inc., Golden parachutes

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The SEC, recognizing that many transactions between a public company and its insiders may not affect the markets, has revised the rules for Sec. 16

Article Abstract:

The SEC has with an amendment of Rule 16b-3, taking effect on Aug 15, 1996, simplified the liability for insider-only securities transactions as well as relaxing the reporting requirements for such transactions if a few relatively simple conditions are satisfied. There will now be four categories of insider only transactions with easily satisfied conditions. The new rules also introduce group reporting and make other simplifications.

Author: Cagney, Lawrence K.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
United States. Securities and Exchange Commission

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


SEC acts on selective disclosures; the agency announced its first Regulation FD enforcement actions, plus a new rule on financial data

Article Abstract:

The first Regulation FD enforcement actions of the SEC are discussed, along with the names of the companies targeted for such enforcement and exactly what they were found guilty of. The rules regulate insider trading and define the practice

Author: DeJong, Eric, Sassalos, Paul, Landefeld, Stewart
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2003
Legal issues & crime, Government regulation (cont), Government regulation, Legal/Government Regulation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Disclosure (Securities law), Insider trading in securities, Insider trading (Securities)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A roomful of comments; Ethics 2000 Commission asks for input on the Model Rules - and gets plenty. From death's door
  • Abstracts: Windows DNA offers safe means of transmission; legal departments can make secure transfers of sensitive information to outside counsel
  • Abstracts: The dominance of managed care organizations as buyers of drugs and medical devices raises regulatory concerns over development and marketing practices
  • Abstracts: Employee's objection to substantial detrimental changes. Redundancy payment deducted after "Polkey reduction." (United Kingdom)
  • Abstracts: Professor, two students defeat INS - judges rave, Cuban stays
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.